Older stars lose their youthful veneer but often gain something special in the process. Examples? Kevin Costner, Jean Smart and Pierce Bros...

Older stars lose their youthful veneer but often gain something special in the process.

Examples? Kevin Costner, Jean Smart and Pierce Brosnan have only gotten better with age. Add Hugh Grant to that list.

The befuddled hero from 1994’s “Four Weddings and a Funeral” is showing remarkable range as he enters his 60s. He recently stole 2023’s “Wonka” as the sole Oompa Loompa. Before that, he left us shaken with Max’s “The Undoing” (2020). 

Now, he’s giving two Mormon missionaries the fright of their lives in “Heretic.” The spiritual thriller can’t quite close the deal, but Grant’s deft performance is one for the ages.

And, yes, you won’t find “Heretic” playing at any Mormon gathering or spiritual retreat.

YouTube Video

Sister Barnes and Sister Paxton (Sophie Thatcher, Chloe East) are spreading the good word when they knock on the door of a kindly gentleman named Mr. Reed (Grant). Sister Paxton is comically naive about, well, everything. Sister Barnes knows a little more about the secular world.

But not much.

Together, they’re eager to spend time with Mr. Reed, assuming he can coax his wife into the living room. They’re not allowed to speak to a man without a woman present.

Mrs. Reed is busy baking a blueberry pie in the kitchen. That gives her husband enough time to quiz the Sisters on their faith.

Boy, does he have a lot of questions. Some of them make the ladies uncomfortable. Audiences will feel the same way, and that sense of unease is just beginning.

Grant’s Mr. Reed is inquisitive and kind, full of charming contradictions. He’s eager for a robust conversation on faith, but there’s something sinister lurking beneath that genial appearance.

Grant teases it out to perfection. He’s as scary as Freddy, Jason or Michael Myers, eventually .. but maybe not Art the Clown.

Who is, though?

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by A24 (@a24)

Writer/directors Scott Beck and Bryan Woods (“A Quiet Place,” “Haunt”) have plenty on their minds about faith, consumerism and western culture. Their screenplay evokes board games and musical lawsuits, catching us off guard.

Grant ties them into one, absurdist bow, never letting us forget the darker themes in play.

It’s mostly smart and sobering, and if you suspect the film has something sinister to say about organized religion you’ve seen one too many Hollywood movies. The story still won’t fit into that neat, predictable box. And the journey is so intriguing you may not realize you’re part of a cinematic finger wag.

Impressive.

YouTube Video

Like too many horror movies, “Heretic” sets up a beguiling premise but doesn’t quite know how to wrap it up in compelling fashion. The third act feels more like a conventional horror film, complete with head-scratching twists and gore galore.

Beck and Woods are so firmly in command you’ll want to push past the narrative chasms. Some are still too much for any genre fan to swallow. Others are absurd, but the devious production design lets us swallow the silliness whole.

“Heretic” unleashes on organized faith, but it does so in a way that leaves some compelling wiggle room. That’s smart and oddly satisfying, a case of lowered expectations from an industry relentlessly wary of spiritual nods.

Still, it would be better if Mr. Reed’s adversaries brought something extra to the conversation. They’re more or less rhetorical punching bags, but the script empowers them in other ways.

The latter feels convenient, not subversive.

That’s a shame. A more robust third-act confrontation would have elevated “Heretic” above and beyond most genre frights. As is, Grant’s transformative turn is more than enough reason to recommend it.

HiT or Miss: “Heretic” gives star Hugh Grant his latest chance to shine, although you’d happily run away from his latest cinematic portrait.

The post ‘Heretic’ Turns Hugh Grant into a Charming Monster appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/MH2XCin

David Lynch’s “The Straight Story” (1999) is his least expected work and one of his best. Atypically straightforward but rich with expecte...

David Lynch’s “The Straight Story” (1999) is his least expected work and one of his best.

Atypically straightforward but rich with expected visual poetry, Lynch directed this from a screenplay by Mary Sweeney and John Roach. The film tells the amazing story of Alvin Straight, an elderly Iowan who drove his tractor 300 miles to visit his ailing brother.

Richard Farnsworth stars as Alvin Straight, a WWII veteran who walks with two canes. His days are quiet, and his reputation is well-established in Laurens, Iowa. Recognizing his ailing health and how a rift between him and his brother (Harry Dean Stanton) has kept them apart for two long, Straight privately and stubbornly plans to make trip to see him.

Bearing in mind his age, Straight decided on a vehicle more fitting for him than a commercial vehicle. This is a true story, in which a 73-year-old, in 1994, drove his lawnmower 300 miles to Wisconsin.

YouTube Video

Despite a wave of critical acclaim in the fall of ’99, it has become a little-known gem in Lynch’s body of work. Made in between “Lost Highway” (1997) and “Mulholland Dr.” (2001), this is even more out of character and startling to see in Lynch’s body of work than “Dune” (1984).

It opens with the once-in-a-lifetime sight of the Disney logo, followed by Lynch’s name as director.

The inciting incident is striking, filmed in almost the same way as the legendary opener for “Blue Velvet” (1986). In fact, the establishing shots of Alvin’s hometown evoke the title credits of “Twin Peaks.” For a film that seems so apart from Lynch’s usual output, the director has made the material his own and adapted it into his unique and recognizable cinematic universe.

RELATED: HOW LYNCH’S ‘MULHOLLAND DRIVE’ INVADED OUR DREAMS

Another Lynchian touch is the elevated sound design. When Alvin lights a cigar, the sound of the match hitting the box is akin to the eruption of the bonfire that begins Lynch’s “Wild At Heart” (1990). Lynch creates genuine suspense in the depiction of Alvin’s unpredictable journey.

Farnsworth maintains the familiar twinkle in his eye, but there is a touching honesty, even a raw quality to his performance, which is just about perfect. Farnsworth died at the age of 80 a year after the film was released.

Film historians may look at his work in “The Grey Fox” and “Anne of Green Gables” as more iconic, but what he achieves for Lynch is a true milestone and not the condescending wacky grandpa type of role most actors his age would find themselves in.

Lynch’s film isn’t cute, and neither is Farnsworth’s performance.

Sissy Spacek co-stars as Rose, Alvin’s daughter, who is defined as “a little bit slow.” Spacek is magnificent in this. Yes, I’ve seen “Carrie” and “Coal Miner’s Daughter,” but this is her best performance.

Bruce McGill has a great cameo, as does Stanton in a real beauty of a single scene, but the film belongs to Farnsworth and Spacek.

YouTube Video

There’s poetry in the imagery, such as the moving bit where Rose watches a young boy pick up a ball off her lawn and walk off. We initially don’t know at first if it’s really happening, or a flashback or something else.

A later scene, between Alvin and a hitchhiker he meets over a bonfire, is so beautifully written, it could have been a perfect short film by itself. Likewise, the powerful, remarkable scene in which Alvin and another war veteran make a private confession to each other in an empty bar.

Despite the G-rating, this is not a children’s film. The Mouse House vote of confidence in this as a potential breakout hit was ill-advised, as the film never found much of an audience and the studio seemed clueless as to how they should market it.

Yes, as you have guessed, “The Straight Story” is slow and measured like its protagonist. Without Lynch, this could have been a disposable, corny Hallmark made-for-TV movie. In the hands of the creator of “Blue Velvet,” Lynch doesn’t merely make this fittingly eccentric, but seemingly lived in, real and oddly plausible.

John Roach and Mary Sweeney’s screenplay is never condescending and, as usual, Lynch’s vision is enhanced by Angelo Badalamenti’s tender score.

Despite the acclaim in ‘99, “The Straight Story” has become one of Lynch’s most under-the-radar achievements. Twenty-five years since its release, you rarely hear the film mentioned anymore.

It deserves rediscovery, not merely because of its place in Lynch’s body of work but because his engagement with the material matches his passion for the tortured and moving figures of his best films. Lynch cares about these characters – even at their most eccentric, they are vulnerable, real and moving.

“The Straight Story” remains a work of passion from one of our most consistently surprising filmmakers.

The post How David Lynch Buckled Our Knees with ‘The Straight Story’ appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/sAWirxz

Alan Rudolph’s “Breakfast of Champions” (1999) is messy, dated and occasionally brilliant. Following a high-profile premiere and a negative...

Alan Rudolph’s “Breakfast of Champions” (1999) is messy, dated and occasionally brilliant.

Following a high-profile premiere and a negative reaction from the Berlin International Film Festival, Rudolph’s film, a consistently surreal adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut’s hilarious, satirical and far more grounded 1973 novel, was dumped into theaters in 2000.

In fact, I caught it during a one-week run at the now-closed Esquire Theater in Denver, Colo. I didn’t like the film as much as the book and recognized how daft and off-putting the film was but, nevertheless, liked it and defended it in print.

YouTube Video

Over the years, it’s become a punching bag for Rudolph and a go-to example of a great Vonnegut novel done dirty on the big screen. Of course, when the top-tier example is still George Roy Hill’s fantastic “Slaughterhouse Five” (1972) and few even remember this barely-released oddity, it’s no wonder Rudolph’s film was not only rejected but, far worse, forgotten.

Now, “Breakfast of Champions” returns in a beautiful, 4K upgrade and is back in theaters for a limited release.

Bruce Willis stars as Dwayne Hoover, a car salesman who is, by far, the most famous person in Midland City. Hoover’s frantic, ubiquitous commercials made him a local celebrity.

Despite Hoover’s leering, energetic presence on TV, he’s miserable and coming apart in real life. His mornings begin with bouts of putting a gun in his mouth and admitting to himself that he has no idea who he really is. His lounge singer son (Lukas Haas) and spacey wife (Barbara Hershey) are disconnected from him.

Hoover’s staff includes a paranoid number two (Nick Nolte), a crazed former prisoner (Omar Epps) who sports a similar name to Hoover’s, and Hoover’s secretary (Glenn Headley), who he’s having an affair with during business hours. Hoover suddenly believes that the arrival in Midland City of author/weirdo Kilgore Trout (Albert Finney) will finally bring some meaning to his life and that Trout may have the answers he seeks.

Less a proper, exacting Vonnegut adaptation than a thematic reaction to it, the smart, focused satire of Vonnegut’s novel has been replaced by broad, Looney Tunes-like satire. Sometimes this works but often the viewer will feel like they’re being pummeled by an overzealous birthday party clown.

The movie is often too much.

RELATED: REFLECTIONS ON BRUCE WILLIS’ FINAL DECADE OF ACTING

Things get off on the right foot, with the titles exploding onscreen, sporting Vonnegut’s hand-drawn art and title font from the book (one of Vonnegut’s funniest illustrations is paired with Rudolph’s name). Accompanied by Mark Isham’s wonderful score, the feeling is akin to being in a car ride that is exhilarating but uneasy, as the driver is going too fast.

The style is immediately brisk, hallucinatory and a lot for some audience members to adapt to.

Hoover is the kind of beloved local celebrity who is expected to smile and entertain the moment he walks into a room. Willis could likely have related to this kind of stress, being a celebrity who first gained adoration on TV.

A scene where Hoover is horrified when his staff surprises him by wearing masks of his mug at work is a perfect embodiment of this level of unease at being so accessible to your fans. Hoover seemingly has it all but feels the walls closing in around him. Willis, in perhaps his most under-estimated performance, is excellent here.

The rest of the impressive ensemble isn’t entirely well matched, as Finney seems miscast. The Trout of the novel (who Vonnegut fans recognize as an alter ego) is witty and elegant. Finney’s take is all bluster, appears off putting and trips over the witty dialogue.

The pathos is there, and Finney seems as nuts as everyone else onscreen, but I missed the novel’s musings on Trout’s fantastic-sounding stories. Finney and Haas’ scenes ramble on too long.

Nolte’s scenes, involving a “secret” and his spiritualist wife (a standout Vicki Lewis), are the most dated, very 1960s touches here. Epps’ wild turn is unlike anything else he’s ever done (at one point, Hoover understandably asks someone if Epps’ character is really standing there) and Shawnee Smith has a great bit as Hoover’s waitress.

Hershey is strangely wasted in a role that acts as a plot function.

Hoover’s fame is akin to “Crazy Eddie” Antar, the wildly popular 1970s-80s TV pitchman (played by Jerry Carroll) who fronted the East Coast chain of electronic stores, which wound up fronting a massive scam. Danny DeVito has been circling a film version of the “Crazy Eddie” story, though Willis’ take on Hoover suggests Crazy Eddie’s genial madness.

Another film depicting a car salesman as a celebrity and public figure that plays like an even darker version of Rudolph’s film is Larry Cohen’s little-seen, but excellent, shocking “Bone” (1972).

Filmed in Twin Falls, Idaho (coincidentally, a great film sporting that name from Michael and Mark Polish appeared in 1999) but, like many of Rudolph’s prior films, seemingly disconnected from his body of work.

Rudolph became an acclaimed filmmaker for his eclectic mood pieces, like “Choose Me” (1984) and “Trouble in Mind” (1986), but his best films are among his most experimental, like the dream-like “Equinox” (1992), the superb literary world period drama “Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle” (1994) and, his absolute best, the film noir-infused domestic comedy, “The Secret Lives of Dentists” (2003).

YouTube Video

Rudolph previously collaborated with Willis on “Mortal Thoughts” (1991), where the star was extraordinary playing a doomed, abusive husband. Cast alongside his then-wife Demi Moore, both Moore and Willis have cited in print that the film represented their best work.

Willis clearly trusted Rudolph, and the director provided him with a great showcase for his comic and dramatic capabilities in his take on Dwayne Hoover.

As a spoof on the American dream going askew and the lost seeking to be redeemed, we see how a Maui vacation becomes the embodiment of salvation for the film’s characters. It was a mistake on Rudolph’s part not to date this: if this is then-contemporary America, the vision is a swirling miasma of anxiety, but if a title card told us this was 1973 or set in the 1970s, we’d recognize the character’s turmoil, living in a Watergate/still-in-Vietnam existence.

Some scenes play like overly caffeinated “SNL” sketches but the best moments, of which there are many, take center, even as much of the film is juiced up on Rudolph’s experimental touches. The excellent parts of “Breakfast of Champions” connect to Vonnegut’s central conflict, of mere mortals trying and failing to grasp the meaning of life.

There’s a beautifully acted scene between Willis and Nolte, where the two salesmen share deep confessions but neither is really hearing the other. The climax is emotional and satisfying, in its own peculiar way, but what it all means is highly debatable (I’d say the conclusion of this and “Fight Club” reach the same thematic end).

The film’s all-out rejection in theaters was especially odd when you consider that Willis was coming off “The Sixth Sense.” You’d figure curious filmgoers would at least give it a robust opening weekend. Even lesser vehicles like “The Story of Us” (1999) and “Disney’s The Kid” (2000) were much more successful for Willis.

The stench of failure towards Rudolph’s film lingered for years until it fell to a bottom-of-the-discount-DVD-bin purgatory.

When people tell me they hate Rudolph’s “Breakfast of Champions,” it’s usually because they understandably prefer Vonnegut’s far more focused novel or simply “didn’t get” what Rudolph and his cast were aiming for.

There are flaws in Rudolph’s film, mostly in his tendency to squeeze in too many subplots and characters into an already busy swirl of mania. Yet, given a fresh look (no joke – the 4K upgrade makes the colors richer and the Mad Hatter vision fuller) and taken as a companion piece to Vonnegut’s novel, as well as a forgotten showcase for Willis’ under-appreciated abilities as an actor, the return of “Breakfast of Champions” is an overdue event.

The post Discarded ‘Breakfast of Champions’ Gets a Second Chance appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/HA1pDOE