‘Reminders of Him’ Has Perfect Secret Weapon

Mainstream movie romances have set requirements.

Predictability. Comfort. No character’s edge can be too unforgiving, even if it seems like it on the surface.

“Reminders of Him” follows that format to a T. The film, based on Colleen Hoover’s bestseller and co-written by the novelist, understands the assignment perfectly.

The wild card? Star Maika Monroe’s face, an instrument capable of endless shades of pain, discomfort and, eventually, joy. Her performance turns even mediocre scenes into consequential turns.

And her on-screen partner, played by Tyriq Withers, holds her own while anchoring the film’s masculine component. (He even uses nail polish after a youngster playfully paints his fingernails)

 

Kenna (Monroe) moves back to her late lover’s hometown of Paradise, Wyoming. She’s fresh out of jail after a seven-year sentence.

Why?

She was driving her beau Scotty (Rudy Pankow) home when their car crashed, injuring her and killing him. And she had drugs in her system and left the scene of the crime while he was still alive.

Now, she wants to rebuild her life and, far more importantly, see the daughter she gave birth to in prison for the first time.

Good luck. Scotty’s parents (Lauren Graham, Bradley Whitford) adopted young Diem (Zoe Kosivic) and want nothing to do with Kenna. They haven’t even told the five-year-old about her, beyond a silly lie about her needing a bigger car to visit.

Fate brings Kenna into a bar run by Ledger (Withers), a former Denver Broncos player. Ledger was Scotty’s best friend, but he never got to meet Kenna due to his busy NFL schedule.

When the two meet early in the film, sparks fly (and then some). Ledger’s ties to Scotty run deep. He took on a sizable role in young Diem’s life, serving as a father figure of sorts while Mom served her prison sentence.

See where this is going? We all do, and that’s understandable. We need to watch the story pieces fall into place and feel some emotional pull in the process.

That’s more or less what happens.

Monroe is best known for turns in strong horror entries like “It Follows” and “Longlegs.” Here, she’s doing the opposite of what Claire Danes might attempt, at least if you’ve seen the latter in Netflix’s new series “The Beast in Me.”

Monroe makes the quiet creative choice in every scene, expressing pain in small gestures and facial movements. Sure, she’s movie-star beautiful, but the pain etched in her performance is profound.

Director Vanessa Caswill keeps the mood civil, albeit heartbreaking, with only two jarring exceptions. One is a bizarre, post-coital exchange that could have been black humor on steroids, but it stops the movie cold. The film’s third act reveals are unnecessarily tidy, but the cast handles the rough spots as well as could be expected.

Still, Caswill’s light touch is mirrored by the leads, who understand the story’s heft and refuse to double down on sticky sentiment.

Other gentle touches are more than welcome, like a crisp supporting turn from Monika Myers as a fellow motel dweller. A running gag about a “freakin’ pigeon” is cute at first but overstays its welcome.

It’s hard to escape a formulaic romance without a dash of cringe.

That “Reminders of Him” steers mostly clear of those speed bumps, and delivers the heart-tugging moments so well, it means the film missed its Valentine’s Day release date by a month.

HiT or Miss: “Reminders of Him” makes a few tonal mistakes but otherwise delivers the kind of romantic pairing that’s tailor made for the big screen.

The post ‘Reminders of Him’ Has Perfect Secret Weapon appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/Jig1TCv

‘Project Hail Mary’ Takes Aim at A.I. Slop, Sequelitis

Sequels. Prequels. Reboots. Re-imaginings. Spinoffs. Shared universes.

And, of course, the rise of A.I. slop.

We’ve grown numb to films that look and feel all too familiar, and we often flock to see them anyway. It’s almost like comfort food – safe, reassuring and bland. Along comes “Project Hail Mary,” and it’s a course correction of the first order.

The story, based on the novel by Andy Weir of “The Martian” fame, packs so much humor, heart and humanity into its two-plus hour running time that it feels dizzying. That’s above and beyond the superlative turn by star Ryan Gosling.

There’s enough originality from directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (“The LEGO Movie”) to fill a dozen movie theaters. And here we are, eager to savor it in one, admittedly overlong bite.

Gosling stars as Ryland Grace, an aw, shucks biology teacher pressed into the most unusual service. Ominous reports are tracking an outer space substance infiltrating the sun.

And, slowly but surely, extinguishing it.

Ryland’s unorthodox thinking got him kicked out of the Science, Inc. community, but a determined international task force leader named Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller) thinks he might be the one to save the world.

The film’s smart story structure follows Ryland as he tries to crack the crisis from the confines of space. And, along the way, we get rigorously structured flashbacks to show how he got here in the first place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A post shared by IMAX (@imax)

The storytelling is relentlessly smart, from the strong performances to the way that intricate theories are presented as both bright and accessible. Gosling may be movie-star handsome, but his vulnerability is what sells the character.

He’s a puzzle solver of the highest order, but he isn’t sure he has the heroism side of the equation nailed down. Nor do we, which makes “Project Hail Mary” all the more exhilarating.

The film’s first act is darn near flawless, and we’re absorbed by the quest and its sticky obstacles. Midway through, Ryland learns he’s not alone. That part of the film takes a quirkier path, opening the story up in ways that are fascinating and, to be fair, often trite.

It feels cynical to frame it as such, especially when we’re witnessing a crowd-pleasing film brimming with wit and ingenuity. The film may lose some older viewers here, potentially, as well as those who still haven’t forgiven George Lucas for those blasted Ewoks.

The film’s sturdy structure never fades. In ways, it only grows richer.

FAST FACT: Author Andy Weir landed work as a lab assistant at Sandia National Labs, a Department of Energy installation, when he was just 15.

The special effects are as stunning as we’ve come to expect from mainstream Hollywood, but there’s something grounded about the presentation. The FX crew isn’t trying to dazzle or distract us. The ship in question feels as grounded as the Nostromo from “Alien,” a very high compliment.

The rest hangs on Gosling’s shoulders, and in a wild way, his adventures are similar to those of Tom Hanks and his unusual pal in “Cast Away.”

Yes, “Project Hail Mary” goes on too long, and the third act packs more than a few, “wait, this isn’t the final conflict” moments? It ends on a note that’s graceful and satisfactory, sticking the landing after already achieving so much more than most films ever think of attempting.

Take that, Tilly Norwood!

HiT or Miss: “Project Hail Mary” is messy but moving, a marvel of science fiction storytelling that never leaves the human element behind.

The post ‘Project Hail Mary’ Takes Aim at A.I. Slop, Sequelitis appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/mfAgqp4

Why ‘INLAND EMPIRE’ Was Pure, Unfiltered Lynch

David Lynch’s “INLAND EMPIRE” (2006) begins, fittingly, with a grand gesture.

The spotlight shines on the title, followed by a prelude with a record needle (so the song begins …), blurred black and white footage of a hallway and Polish dialogue.

We see a prostitute and a client with blurred-out faces, then cut away to a character staring at a static TV and crying (not unlike the opening of Lynch’s 1992 puzzle, “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me”). It’s all been shot on digital photography and resembles snippets from our deep unconscious.

You lost yet? Just go with it.

We meet a Hollywood film actress named Nikki Grace (Laura Dern) who has a bizarre encounter with a stranger (an eerie Gracie Zabriskie) who talks her way into Nikki’s home and gives her a vague but menacing warning.

The Dern/ Zabriskie conversation is eerily like the frightening party exchange between Bill Pullman and Robert Blake in “Lost Highway” (1997).

Immediately after this, Nikki is cast in a project with a promising co-star (Justin Theroux) and a confident director (Jeremy Irons) but a dark truth clouds the proceedings. It turns out this new film has a haunted history and is “based on a Polish folktale and said to be cursed.”

The cast and crew carry on until Nikki starts to find it difficult to tell the difference between her real life and the character she’s playing, as moments on and off the set start to blend together. By the midpoint, Irons lays down the lore and, with that, the audience tumbles down the rabbit hole with Dern and Lynch.

RELATED: HOW LYNCH’S ‘MULHOLLAND DR.’ INVADED OUR DREAMS

As with every Lynch film, I find that a second or third viewing goes a long way to fully appreciating (if not fully comprehending) his work. This was also the experience I had with Lynch’s “Wild at Heart” (1990) and “Mulholland Dr.” (2001), two great but challenging, idiosyncratic and casually surrealistic works that seem impenetrable at first.

Your experience may not be the same as mine, but I initially found some of Lynch’s films off-putting and easy to resist. Giving a second or third look has only enriched my affection and understanding but, again, Lynch’s polarizing films (even his most acclaimed) aren’t for everyone.

I saw “INLAND EMPIRE” on opening day, my birthday in fact, at the great Mayan Theater in Denver, Colo. What I remember most about the experience is that for the first two hours (the running time clocks in at a whopping 180-minutes) I sat close to the screen, wanting to absorb everything.

A few massive jump scares and jarring transitions later, I spent the last hour in the row furthest from the screen. I seemed to have forgotten how terrifying Lynch’s films can be, as there are moments in “INLAND EMPIRE” every bit as jolting as the biggest shocks in “Lost Highway” (1997).

We lost Lynch last year, at the age of 78. Now that his body of work has a beginning and end and “INLAND EMPIRE” represents the final theatrical film release of his career (with the awesome “Twin Peaks – The Return” on Showtime his swan song), what can we make of it?

Is it a self-indulgent folly or on the level with his best films? Actually, yes to both of those questions.

If you’ve never liked Lynch’s work, this won’t be the one to change your mind. Also, if you’ve read this far and have never seen a Lynch film, I recommend starting with “The Elephant Man” (1980) or “The Straight Story” (1999).

Lynch’s true masterpiece is probably the entirety of “Twin Peaks” (the first two seasons from 1990-1991, the 1992 prequel film, then the 2017 Showtime mini-series). Nevertheless, while “INLAND EMPIRE” could have used a severe edit before release and has passages it doesn’t need, its best moments, of which there are many, demonstrate how Lynch’s works were thrilling alive, defiant and personal.

Arguably, the most infamous moments here are the bits with a family of rabbits (specifically, actors with large rabbit masks on) who sit around and converse while a laugh track accompanies dialogue devoid of humor. These bits play like an existential goof, not unlike Lynch’s “The Angriest Dog Alive” comic strip (they’re still online and worth a look).

That we see this bizarre segment (with Naomi Watts and Scott Coffey among the voices of the Rabbit family) before the story kicks in is a bold touch.

Repeat viewings of “INLAND EMPIRE” are essential, as it’s initially difficult to gauge which narrative we’re supposed to invest in (my take- everything is a subconscious prelude until Dern shows up).

For Lynch completists and adventurous filmgoers, there’s much here to savor, let alone wrap your head around. Fans of “Wild At Heart” will note that the film’s Oscar-nominated MVP, Diane Ladd, has a nutty cameo appearance here as a talk show host (meanwhile, William H. Macy has exactly one line in one very brief scene).

The title of Nikki Grace’s vehicle, “On High Noon in Blue Tomorrows,” even sounds like it could be an extension of the “Invitation to Love” soap opera that captivated the town of Twin Peaks.

“INLAND EMPIRE,” in the best way, often feels like an extension of the themes within “Mulholland Dr.” Both works contrast the real and unreal, Hollywood gloss and ugly reality and show us something so beautiful, followed by a truly ghastly vision.

These are consistent themes with Lynch’s work.

Of the moments I savor, Julia Ormond has one scary single scene as a suspect being interrogated by a cop. Terry Crews shows up as a homeless man. Oh, and there’s a musical number! Two, in fact. Okay, now I sound like I’m describing a dream.

I’ll conclude with a quote from Lynch’s 2006 book, “Catching the Big Fish,” about how his ideas manifest themselves. The chapter entitled “INLAND EMPIRE” begins this way:

“When we began, there wasn’t any INLAND EMPIRE, there wasn’t anything. I just bumped into Laura Dern in the street, discovering that she was my new neighbor. I hadn’t seen her for a long time, and she said, ‘David, we’ve got to do something together again.’ And I said, ‘We sure do. Maybe I’ll write something for you. And maybe we’ll do it as an experiment for the Internet.’ And she said, ‘Fine.’”

The brief chapter has Lynch recalling how a lengthy monologue became something even bigger. Lynch concludes the chapter with this:

“But it wasn’t until halfway through that, suddenly, I saw a kind of form that would unite the rest, everything that had come before. And that was a big day. That was a good day, because I could pretty much say that it would be a feature film.”

The post Why ‘INLAND EMPIRE’ Was Pure, Unfiltered Lynch appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/76ARLqD

This One Thing Separates ‘Arco’ from the Animated Pack

The beginning of “Arco,” Ugo Bienvenu’s wonderful, animated fantasy, depicts the future world of 2932, where citizens live in clouds and time travel is a possibility.

Although time travel is forbidden for children under 12, young Arco (Juliano Krue Valdi) takes a literal leap from an impossibly high platform and tumbles into 2075. Initially, Arco is determined to find a way back home, but finds his journey is complicated by the friendship he shares with a ten-year old named Iris (Romy Fay).

This gorgeous French animated film is a time travel sci-fi adventure, and a look into a wild, plausible vision of the distant future. It’s also a little bit like “E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial” (1982), but in the best way.

The only real stumbling block is in the needless villains and how they have been adapted for the US audience: Perhaps the trio of villains worked in the French version but, in the English dubbed US version provided by NEON, as voiced by Will Ferrell, Andy Samberg and Flea, the characters are more puzzling and irritating than intended.

The Three Stooges-like villains, all sporting ’80s-style sunglasses and stumbling over one another in every scene, may have clicked in the original version. Finding anything consistently funny for these nitwits to say proves to be a challenge even for the likes of Ferrell and Samberg.

“Arco” is absolutely spellbinding to gaze at, with the hand-drawn animation something truly special in the age of CGI over-saturation.

Bienvenu’s film resembles a Hayao Miyazaki movie at times and taps into the Studio Ghibli format. More importantly, it makes us care and invest emotionally in this world, even with the dream logic.

It takes the entire film to completely explain that logic and the specificity of the future settings, when a title card could have pulled us in quicker.

Yet “Arco” is rich with the sense of discovery it provides audiences. I was mesmerized by the depth of detail and a willingness to fully engage our imaginations right from the first scene.

It’s surprisingly emotional, with a death scene in the late going that earns our tears. Despite a few intense moments, this is mostly family-friendly. The PG-rating is merited and, unlike the recent “Sketch” (2025), an indication that early grade school kids won’t find it too grown-up or scary.

Finding a good family film to share with your child or children can be difficult. After all, what merits a PG rating, let alone is considered universally appropriate for a young audience, is highly debatable.

This is one of the few contemporary family films that I loved to share with my child and look forward to revisiting again. The beauty of “Arco” is as rich as the emotion and sweetness of the story.

Three and a half stars (out of four)

The post This One Thing Separates ‘Arco’ from the Animated Pack appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/4KzedCc

‘Dolly’ Gets Under Your Skin (And Stays There)

Dolls are a horror director’s best friend.

Those old-school toys, think porcelain features and glassy-eyed stares, can make grown men think twice about turning off the lights at night.

Director Rod Blackhurst leans into that with “Dolly,” a grindhouse romp with as many flaws as selling points. The latter wins the day, and we may have witnessed the dawn of a new movie monster.

Freddie. Jason. Michael. Art.

Dolly?

Seann William Scott plays Chase, a single dad who thinks he’s met The One. That’s Macy (Fabianne Therese), who loves Chase but isn’t sure she’s cut out for motherhood.

He takes her on a camping trip so he can propose at the most scenic place possible. A series of dolls elaborately displayed in the woods catches his eye, and he decides to investigate.

No, Stifler, no!

Lurking in the woods is a hulking figure wearing an oversized doll mask. This wordless Dolly (ex-wrestler Max the Impaler in an impressive screen debut) has a shovel and knows how to use it.

Before long, it’s Final Girl time, with Macy trying to stay alive under the worst of circumstances. It doesn’t help that her survival instincts are atrocious, making “Dolly” the kind of film that almost demands audience feedback.

HiT never recommends talking in a movie theater, but …

EXCLUSIVE: @IndieFilmCom & @Shudder’s slasher DOLLY is being called a brutal blend of New French Extremity and ’70s American horror.

We’ve got an exclusive clip of Southbound’s Fabianne Therese trapped by the monster-like Dolly. Watch if you dare. pic.twitter.com/3BBEelKP8o

— Dread Central (@DreadCentral) February 27, 2026

Blackhurst, who co-wrote the screenplay with Brandon Weavil, has a blast recreating that ’70s horror vibe.

• The grainy film stock
• The unexpected musical notes
• The sequences that feel like outtakes from 1974’s “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre”

The film delights in torturing the poor humans in Dolly’s path, and some sequences simply go on too long. That doesn’t detract from the ick factor, which begins from the very first frame and rarely lets up.

Scott is playing against type, and it’s such an understated turn that it’s heartbreaking. Therese knows the assignment by heart, alternating between victim and resourceful heroine. And boy, can she scream.

Still, the number of times you’ll roll your eyes at Macy’s boneheaded decisions is high.

The third act features some out-of-left-field creative choices that add little to the chills. And some sequences don’t have the impact the creative team likely expected.

Still, this is raw horror at its most unrelenting, a chance to savor throwback genre moves without feeling guilty.

Best of all, Dolly’s mere presence is all the scares the film requires. Those twitching fingers and warped maternal instincts are pure nightmare fuel.

Now, imagine seeing Dolly again … and again.

Stick around through the credits to see if she’s ready for more.

HiT or Miss: “Dolly” isn’t for the squeamish or those who demand a measure of genre consistency. Everyone else will be dialed in from the jump.

The post ‘Dolly’ Gets Under Your Skin (And Stays There) appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/YJh2XSP

Woke ‘Bride!’ Feels Like Blast from Cancel Culture Past

Jeb Bush would like his exclamation mark back, thank you.

Or should we say, “Thank you!”

“The Bride!” goes the full Jeb in ways that remind us of his crash-and-burn presidential campaign. Writer/director Maggie Gyllenhaal goes for broke on her second film, taking Mary Shelley’s classic tome and turning it into a MeToo lecture.

It’s a garishly beautiful lecture, but the film’s core themes are redundant and dull.

Men bad. Women good … and oppressed … and angry.

Sorry. They’re angry!

When we first meet Ida (Jessie Buckley, the future Bride), she’s stuck in a posh restaurant surrounded by sweaty, arrogant men. The setting? 1930s Chicago, a time when women had far less agency than they enjoy today.

This is what you call foreshadowing.

A disagreement leaves her dead at the bottom of a stairway, but that’s just the way Frank (Christian Bale) wants her. He’s a scarred soul stitched together by a mad scientist decades earlier, and he desperately wants a mate.

You can’t blame the guy. 

So he digs up the recently buried Ida and brings her to Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening). The doctor quickly revives her, but she isn’t sure what her name is or who she was before her murder.

She bonds, to a degree, with Frank (yes, it’s short for Frankenstein), and before you can say, “Bonnie and Clyde,” the two are off on a deadly adventure.

They can’t stop killing those who won’t accept them for their authentic, stitched-together selves. That gets the attention of two detectives (Peter Sarsgaard, Penélope Cruz) who track the pair with some help from their love of feature films.

Confused? Gyllenhaal’s script doesn’t sweat many (any?) details, but suffice it to say “The Bride!” is a love story/monster movie/road trip all in one.

RELATED: ‘FRANKENSTEIN’ LIVES … TO PASS JUDGMENT ON US

The film sneaks in a few pop culture nods, including a giggle-worthy shout-out to “Young Frankenstein.” Boris Karloff’s “Monster Mash” plays over the end credits. And the script slams movie sequels for good measure.

This is a full-on re-imagining a Universal monster with a distinct “Joker” vibe. Or is that “Joker: Folie à Deux?” No matter. The tonal whiplash may require Blue Cross / Blue Shield coverage.

The film channels Shelley in ways we won’t reveal, but know it’s a bold move that doesn’t pay off in the slightest. It does give Buckley even more scenery to chew, and she’d better mainline Ozempic after this performance.

Buckley and Bale act as if every scene is a For Your Consideration closeup. And they scream, boy, do they scream. Sure, they’re monsters in various stages of pain (physical and emotional), but the volume wears on the film.

And us.

One dance number mid-film is a hoot, allowing Gyllenhaal to let loose, visually speaking. And the costumes and makeup are never less than astounding.

Whoever created the inky stain on The Bride’s face deserves a fat raise. It’s instantly iconic, even if the film can’t come close to that description.

The bigger issue gnaws at the viewer. Are these two misunderstood souls falling in love? Maybe. Partially. But the Bride’s empowerment journey always comes first.

Gyllenhaal’s feminist agenda starts early and never lets up. Some films treat that subject with care, like 1991’s “The Silence of the Lambs,” which lets us know Clarice Starling’s gender made her unwelcome within the FBI ranks.

Less is more in most cinematic cases. Here, more is decidedly less.

The story’s anachronisms are maddening and inconsistent, and they’re all about pushing an agenda. The phrase “Me too” is literally shouted in case you missed the film’s true north.

Subplots which might have given “The Bride!” heft receive little screen time. There’s a mob boss figure who powers the story, as much of a story as there is, but he’s barely featured enough to matter.

The detectives hot on the monsters’ trail are just as thinly sketched. The actors look alternately bored or bewildered, and Cruz’s story arc is pure cringe. 

It’s hard to knock a film that swings for the fences like “The Bride!” The film just doesn’t measure up to its bold ambitions. The best way to savor it is to bring those fences in until even a pint-sized Little Leaguer could swat it out of the park.

HiT or Miss: “The Bride!” is a messy, madcap love story that looks smashing but eventually wears out its welcome.

The post Woke ‘Bride!’ Feels Like Blast from Cancel Culture Past appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/ZehLCqD

‘The Mastermind’ Keeps Director’s Maddening Streak Intact

Kelly Reichardt’s “The Mastermind” stars Josh O’Connor as James Mooney, a thief who steals works of art right out of museums.

Sarah, James’ mother (the always wonderful Hope Davis), questions his life choices and interrogates him over his recent actions. While James understands that what he’s doing is wrong, he has no intention of stopping.

Released in theaters last fall and now on the Mubi channel, “The Mastermind” represents my latest failure to get into Reichardt’s films. She’s an acclaimed director whose movies have yet to connect with me.

Her latest isn’t a slow burn; it’s just slow. It’s deja vu all over again, as it’s another year, another opportunity for me to give a new Reichardt movie two stars and dismiss it for being a mildly interesting slog.

I’d like to get past this and finally love something she’s made, but, once again, she’s made it impossible for me.

I still admire Reichardt’s ability to create a vivid environment and sustain a mood or scenario that pulls us in. What happens after that, in just about every single one of her films thus far? She loses me with her decision to let her story just float away like a discarded balloon.

It’s irritating because her movies have the potential to be so much more than just mood pieces and unfinished character studies.

Reichardt’s fanbase will completely disagree, but I can only muster up so much enthusiasm for this and “Meek’s Cutoff” (2010), “Showing Up” (2022) and most of her other works.

I’ll confess that I loved Reichardt’s “Wendy and Lucy” (2008), which reduced me to tears at the Denver Film Festival. It was also the last time I saw one of her movies and felt anything besides frustration and the faint feeling that I had been conned.

“Detective” (1985), one of my favorite films from New Wave Cinema auteur extraordinaire Jean-Luc Godard, is, like “The Mastermind,” also a deconstructed heist movie and even more minimalist than this one. Yet, “Detective” is so cool and devoted to breaking down expectations, it manages to captivate, even as it’s basically a movie about nothing.

Here, Reichardt’s recreation of the Vietnam War era and the 1970s in general is dazzling. O’Connor is an interesting actor in the lead (though he basically gives the same performance in the altogether better drama, “Rebuilding,” also from 2025).

O’Connor just scored a major role in Steven Spielberg’s big summer movie,“Disclosure Day” and I wish him well. “Licorice Pizza” stars Alana Haim is also in the cast, but Davis’ performance here is the film’s best, though she has a tendency to be the best thing about most movies in which she appears.

The jazz score is also excellent.

Aside from “Wendy and Lucy,” I liked “The Mastermind” more than most of Reichardt’s recent works, so maybe her art is growing on me. This is cinema, no doubt, but I need a story, too.

Two Stars (out of four)

The post ‘The Mastermind’ Keeps Director’s Maddening Streak Intact appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/g4KyWZ2