# a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
Uneven ‘Keeper’ Threatens Osgood Perkins’ Winning Ways

Uneven ‘Keeper’ Threatens Osgood Perkins’ Winning Ways

Director Osgood Perkins is almost too good at making us squirm.

The mind behind “Longlegs” and “The Monkey” has established himself as horror’s next wunderkind after some early career stumbles.

Now, with “Keeper,” Perkins is taking a swing at the cabin in the woods trope. A story that begins with promise and builds to a nightmarish conflict simply doesn’t know where to go when it matters most.

YouTube Video

Tatiana Maslany plays Liz, an artist in a committed relationship with Malcolm (Rossif Sutherland, son of Donald). The couple drives to an expansive cabin retreat for some serious snuggling. 

They seem happy on the surface, but there’s a discontent between them that’s hard to nail down. Screenwriter Nick Lepard keeps some details fuzzy, while the stars build on that sense of unease.

They’re in love but hardly comfortable in each other’s presence. They act like a couple on their third date, still unsure how far to press their mutual infatuation.

It’s fascinating.

Malcolm seems kind and says all the right things, but the film bombards us with images of beautiful women in various states of despair. What does that mean? And why is Malcolm so fixated on a chocolate cake left behind by the cabin’s caretaker?

Hmmm.

We’ll say no more, but “Keeper” takes that intriguing setup and lets Perkins’ visual imagination do the rest. Dream-like monsters invade the screen. Liz becomes uncertain of Malcolm’s commitment to their bond.

Liz sees disturbing images one moment, and then they disappear after a firm eye blink.

What does it all mean?

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by NEON (@neonrated)

“Keeper” lays out the mystery in a coherent fashion, something that can’t always be said of modern horror films. The pacing is taut, and Maslany’s performance keeps us engaged. She’s believable as a smart, resourceful woman who has been burned by love before.

Tread carefully, she tells herself. 

A narrative wild card? Malcolm’s unctuous cousin (Birkett Turton) drops by mid-film, adding another intriguing element to the mix. He’s brought his gorgeous galpal (Eden Weiss) with him, but she barely speaks English and seems uncomfortable to say the least. 

How will these puzzle pieces come together? And why is Perkins and co. so insistent on draping the cabin in red herrings?

The third act should be a banger, and Perkins arranges some horrifying scares to grease the story’s wheels. But to what end? The genre isn’t immune to head-scratching moments. Heck, many classics serve up just that.

What happens in “Keeper” feels distracting, not inspired. The story should come to a rousing finale, not one that seems haphazardly arranged for minimum impact.

That’s the scariest part of all.

HiT or Miss: “Keeper” marks a maddening misstep for rising horror auteur Osgood Perkins, but it’s still creepy enough to recommend. Barely.

The post Uneven ‘Keeper’ Threatens Osgood Perkins’ Winning Ways appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/Viz6Q9J
‘Rental Family’ Shines Spotlight on Wild Cultural Practice

‘Rental Family’ Shines Spotlight on Wild Cultural Practice

Here’s a shock – hiring an actor to play a long-lost loved one might come with emotional baggage.

The creative team behind “Rental Family” hopes that Billboard-sized revelation is enough to power an Oscar-bait drama. The well-intentioned film, starring an even more well-intentioned Brendan Fraser, shares a curious Japanese practice.

On paper, it’s fine fodder for a feature film. In reality, director HIKARI’s vision lacks purpose and, most importantly, a sense of narrative surprise.

YouTube Video

Fraser stars as Phillip, a middle-aged actor still pining for his big break. He’s found a home for himself in Japan, but relocating to a foreign culture hasn’t afforded him many professional breaks.

He even serves as an “American mourner,” a job that proves baffling on a few levels. It’s a minor moment, but the film never tops this sequence.

It’s odd, fresh and unnerving, and it allows Phillip to explore some all too human reactions.

The dispiriting gig isn’t for naught. It introduces him to Rental Family, a firm that could use a “token white guy” like Phillip. The company hires actors to play various “roles” for clients. If a woman is in love with another woman, she can hire a Rental Family actor to pretend to be her husband.

It’s not a real relationship, but it helps calm the gay panic fears within her family.

Phillip is initially wary of the gig, but he’s talked into the role by the company’s persuasive boss Shinji (Takehiro Hira). The wannabe actor proves to be a quick study, but by entering the lives of people in emotional distress he realizes the limits of the job.

Fraser’s Phillip wants to help his clients in more ways than one. He becomes invested in their struggles, and that forces him to confront the gig’s darker side. He’s playing make believe with real people, and any miscue won’t involve a second take or embarrassing stage gaffe.

People could get hurt.

YouTube Video

“Rental Family” leans on a real-life Japanese practice, one that opens up a world of dramatic possibilities. The film settles for the most obvious conflicts, oblivious to darker themes that could flow from the practice.

Fraser is adept at the task before him, but wouldn’t it be more interesting if his character’s flaws bubbled to the surface? Actors can have notoriously thin skins, for example. Or, Phillip could lean into the power he wields at the risk of his clients’ emotional well-being.

Phillip’s bond with a young girl (Shannon Mahina Gorman) who never knew her real father is the heart of the story, but once again the dramatic tension proves predictable and, even worse, safe.

HIKARI’s script has little interest in nuance. It’s all surface-level observations that fail to explore the ramifications of the Rental Family practive.

Inspirational stories matter. So do films that skim across the human experience, leaving plenty unexplored but still touching our hearts. What’s missing here is a sense of wonder, a feeling that we don’t quite know where the story will head at any given moment.

The film makes fine use of its Tokyo setting, using lush backgrounds and slick urban landscapes to capture a culture most Americans rarely see. That, plus the unique concept in play, suggest Fraser’s “Whale” resurgence was no fluke.

We can’t blame the Oscar winner for a story that lets him and the plot’s potential down.

HiT or Miss: “Rental Family” has a can’t miss premise but refuses to follow the story’s fascinating angles.

The post ‘Rental Family’ Shines Spotlight on Wild Cultural Practice appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/FL7oEmd
‘Wicked: For Good’ Caps Killer Two-Part Odyssey

‘Wicked: For Good’ Caps Killer Two-Part Odyssey

Let’s not bury the lede. Toto’s back!

“Wicked for Good,” the second of the two-part musical adaptation, brings the prequel in line with Frank Baum’s “The Wizard of Oz,” down to the Yellow Brick Road.

The “Wicked” sequel shares the first film’s rich storytelling, bold performances and visual opulence. It’s the best kind of follow-up, one that keeps the original’s momentum and wraps the yarn in a satisfying style.

Oh, and Jeff Goldblum leans so hard into his curious line readings that he threatens to steal the saga. That’s some pretty heavy lifting.

YouTube Video

The story picks up where 2024’s “Wicked” left us. Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) is now known as the Wicked Witch, and Glinda (Ariana Grande) has reluctantly joined forces with the farcical Wizard (Goldblum) and co.

Glinda’s loyalties are torn, but an arranged marriage with the hunky Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey), a captain in the Wizard’s army, suggests she’s willing to embrace the status quo.

Just do what you’re told, and life will be, well, good.

Except she still feels a bond with Elphaba, and an attempt to mend the Wizard/Elphaba chasm may not be enough to save her dear friend.

Meanwhile, Oz has fallen into a quasi-dictatorship. Both Munchkins and animals alike feel the political squeeze despite the Wizard’s aw, shucks pose. The Left will gleefully read parallels into a certain Orange Man, but as a storytelling backdrop, it gets the job done.

And then there’s Madame Morrible (Michelle Yeoh), another Oz power player who boasts abilities that come and go as the story dictates.

Yeah, this is a musical, so more than a few elements leave unanswered questions. Plus, Yeoh may be an Oscar winner, but she lacks the snarl to sell her character’s cruelty.

“Wicked: For Good” overlaps, but never overwhelms, the classic “Wizard of Oz” saga. That means we get glimpses of Dorothy and her faithful canine companion, but the “Wicked” story stays in sharp focus.

We’re also told how the Scarecrow and the Tin Man came to be, origin stories that flirt with body horror tropes.

Goldblum’s Oz is so much better this time around, in part because he isn’t asked to carry a musical number of consequence. He’s also given some of the film’s best laugh lines – this story can be oppressively dark, and any levity is welcome.

YouTube Video

Director John Chu marshals everything a Hollywood studio can deliver from a production design standpoint. It somehow doesn’t overwhelm us, a minor miracle, and the world in play is both inviting and odd. That’s keeping in line with the story’s dystopian underpinnings.

Never mind the downtrodden! What about that Elphaba/Glinda frenemy bond?

None of the songs can match the majesty of “Defying Gravity,” and a few are neither enchanting or necessary. Still, the musical numbers in toto give the sequel its sense of joy, and Chu choreographs them for maximum impact.

Once again, both Erivo and Grande turn in superlative work. Their voices are different but equally strong, and their on-screen bond is palpable.

This is ultimately a story about friendship enduring through the very worst of times. “Wicked: For Good” never lets us forget that.

Nor should it.

Now, “Oz” purists will never accept how the “Wicked” saga contorts the “Oz” tale that dazzled generations of movie lovers. The big third-act twist alone may give some the vapors.

Still, by gently weaving elements of the classic story into “Wicked: For Good” (and Toto, too!), the sequel satisfies.

HiT or Miss: “Wicked: For Good” delivers the larger-than-life finale we crave for the ultimate villain makeover.

The post ‘Wicked: For Good’ Caps Killer Two-Part Odyssey appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/9pCR407
‘Thoughts and Prayers’ Offers Balanced Take on School Shootings

‘Thoughts and Prayers’ Offers Balanced Take on School Shootings

What happens in the minutes before police arrive at a school shooting?

“Thoughts and Prayers” doesn’t shy from this gut-wrenching question, delivering a balanced documentary that sidesteps sensationalism for sober exploration. Instead, it offers a human-centered look at a crisis that has redefined childhood in America.

This isn’t another recap of body counts or political talking points, but an examination of three underreported truths: the collective loss of innocence among all students (not just survivors), the absence of any single solution and the terrifying gap between the first gunshot and law enforcement’s arrival.

In that window, someone has to act. But who?

YouTube Video

The film’s most haunting thread follows children during active shooter drills—now as routine as fire alarms or tornado warnings. Lockdowns are discussed as routinely as tornado warnings.

For this generation—unlike any before—violence is normalized, not hypothetical. The loss is irreversible: stolen peace of mind, even for those miles from tragedy.

“Thoughts and Prayers” spends significant time inside two hyper-realistic mass casualty simulations: one in Medford, Oregon, and another in Long Island, N.Y. Sirens blare. Fake blood pools. Teenagers scream as “victims” while adult volunteers play shooters.

The drills are meant to train first responders—but the camera lingers on the students. The question hangs unspoken: Are we preparing them—or programming them for trauma?

The film widens the victim lens beyond the dead and wounded to include survivors, families, communities—and the millions who attend school daily under a shadow of “what if?” One child claims shootings are kids’ top killer (factually untrue, but the fear feels real).

Cut to the booming $3 billion school safety industry. The documentary tours trade shows where vendors hawk ballistic whiteboards, bulletproof backpacks and pop-up Kevlar tents.

One company sells “realistic” silicone bullet wounds for training—complete with oozing fake blood. Another offers furniture that doubles as shields. These innovations are well-intentioned, but the film treats them with quiet skepticism.

Barriers can delay. They cannot stop.

That’s where mindset training enters. Instructors—many former military or law enforcement—teach students and staff not to freeze. The scene is jarring: a classroom of 14-year-olds practicing how to swarm a gunman with chairs and fire extinguishers.

No one wants this reality. But as the film underscores, denial doesn’t save lives.

This leads to the documentary’s most provocative angle: armed staff. Thirty states now allow teachers or administrators to carry concealed weapons on campus.

YouTube Video

Utah is highlighted as an outlier with no mandated training and no district oversight. The core argument isn’t about guns—it’s about time. In nearly every school shooting, the attacker is neutralized after police arrive. Armed staff, the film suggests, is the only variable that addresses the gap before help comes.

“Thoughts and Prayers” doesn’t demand specific policies or point fingers. Instead, it details that the trauma isn’t just in the aftermath—it’s in the anticipation. One instructor sums it up: “We need to help end the story of active shooters.”

Not with thoughts and prayers alone, but with preparation, conversation and courage. The film leaves you unsettled—not with despair, but with urgency.

School shootings may never be fully prevented. But their impact can be mitigated. And that starts with seeing the full cost: not just the lives lost, but the childhoods stolen, every single day.

“Thoughts and Prayers” is essential viewing—not because it has answers, but because it asks the right questions. In an era of soundbites and slogans, it models how to talk about the unthinkable: clearly, compassionately and without illusion.

Laura Carno is a Colorado resident and the Founder and Executive Director of FASTERColorado.org, which trains armed school security teams.

The post ‘Thoughts and Prayers’ Offers Balanced Take on School Shootings appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/UcmJWeZ
How ‘Young Guns II’ Fueled Unlikely Western Revival

How ‘Young Guns II’ Fueled Unlikely Western Revival

Geoff Murphy’s “Young Guns II” (1990) is better than the film that came before it and has maintained such a favorable reception that reports of a much delayed “Young Guns III” in the works has longtime fans intrigued.

More importantly, let me be clear about this: “Young Guns II” is a great western and worthy of rediscovery for those who only remember it for a certain Jon Bon Jovi song (more on that later).

YouTube Video

An elderly “Brushy Bill” Roberts (Emilio Estevez, effectively hidden beneath tons of convincing make-up and sporting a workable “old man” voice) meets with an attorney (a young Bradley Whitford) in 1950 and reveals that he is actually Billy the Kid.

Despite history telling us that Pat Garrett killed Billy the Kid, “Brushy Bill” tells the tale in which we get the “real” story, which may or may not be true.

We flashback to 1879 and see that Billy the Kid (Estevez, wonderful and boisterous) is still on the run with his Regulators gang, which includes returning outlaws Doc Spurlock (Kiefer Sutherland) and Jose Chavez y Chavez (Lou Diamond Phillips).

The new Regulators include Hendry (Alan Ruck in an unfocused turn), “Arkansas” Dave Rudabaugh (Christian Slater, stealing scenes left and right), and the terminally boyish Tom O’Folliard (Balthazar Getty, right after his breakout turn in “Lord of the Flies”).

Also on Billy’s team is his longtime friend Pat Garrett (William Peterson, post- “To Live and Die in L.A.” and “Manhunter”), who eventually changes sides, accepts a ton of money, gets a haircut, dons a badge and seeks to either arrest or kill Billy.

How true is “Young Guns II” to history? Who cares? I know a few historians and schoolteachers who may be horrified by that but seriously, it’s the story of Billy the Kid. The mythmaking, revisionism and difficulty in separating the man from the legend has always been a problem.

For those who want the story told as “true” to history as possible, I highly recommend Michael Wallis’ absorbing “Billy the Kid: The Endless Ride,” which was published in 2007. You can also visit Salida, Colorado, where two buildings hold competing attractions: one old west museum has Billy the Kid’s grave, while the other displays his gun.

Both locations are great visits for history buffs and worth the drive.

As far as “Young Guns II” is concerned, the most important location attached to the film has to be Old Tucson Studios in Tucson, Arizona. I made a visit out there in 1993, a few days before I saw “Tombstone” (1993) on opening weekend and was stunned to see the distinct, rundown outdoor locations and buildings I saw were utilized for much of that film.

Likewise, when I revisited “Young Guns II,” I recognized so many locations as being sets that once stood in Old Tucson Studios. It’s a fitting connection, as “Young Guns II” may not have a firm grip on western history but is a potent example of the western film genre as a means of shaping legends and tall tales.

At one point in time, during the early years of cinema establishing itself as a new attraction, the two genres that were the most popular were musicals and westerns. It’s no wonder that everyone from Tom Mix to John Wayne became movie gods in the way they embodied a life of survival and discovery.

Estevez and his young Teen Beat Magazine-worthy co-stars were never in the same league as the likes of Wayne or Clint Eastwood. They didn’t have to be.

If “Young Guns” (1988) was about engaging a young teen audience with a very old genre (mission accomplished, as it was a sizable hit), then “Young Guns II” is about the nature of the Western as mythmaking, as well as an ensemble piece that allows the actors to let us in on the good time they’re clearly having.

Estevez’s best dramatic work is probably “The War at Home” (1996) or “The Breakfast Club” (1985) but his take on Billy the Kid, as exuberant and emotionally unstable, with an itchy trigger finger that goes off within seconds, is a pleasure to watch.

Sutherland and Phillips are also solid and intense in their returning roles, though Peterson’s terrific take on Garrett centers the film. There’s also a great single scene cameo from James Coburn, a nice reference to Coburn’s having played Garrett in “Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid” (1973).

Did Murphy think his film had a shot at competing with “Pat Garett and Billy the Kid,” let alone “High Noon” (1952) or “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” (1966)? Of course not. However, film buffs who know their westerns will be quick to recall that the genre didn’t always cater to Oscar voters and cinephiles.

The genre is overloaded with rousing, middle of the road B-films that make up what they lack in budget or prestige with sheer showmanship. “Young Guns II” is a lot like that. To give it a big compliment, I’d say it’s every bit as engaging (though not quite as accomplished) as James Mangold’s “3:10 to Yuma” (2007).

YouTube Video

A word about Jon Bon Jovi’s Oscar-nominated, Golden Globe winning, ubiquitous #1 hit single “Blaze of Glory”: it includes the lyrics “Lord I never drew first, but I drew first blood, I’m a devil’s son, call me young gun.” It’s not poetry and neither is “Young Guns II” but Bon Jovi clearly understands this story and relishes the chance to spin the tale of Billy the Kid as much as Murphy and Estevez.

“Young Guns II” is not pretentious or perfect (it actually could have benefitted from, of all things, being a little longer) but it gets so much right about the power of creating and maintaining a legend. It doesn’t matter if “Brushy Bill” Roberts really was Billy the Kid or not.

It makes for a great story.

Murphy’s film sports grand cinematography by “Mad Max” vet Dean Semler, a thrilling score by Alan Silvestri and enough great scenes to make up for the portions that are just okay. The knife fight between Slater and Phillips is really something, as are the final moments with Sutherland and Phillips.

“Young Guns” (not a bad movie but smaller and far less engrossing than this one) and “Young Guns II” deserve credit for helping keep westerns (so-called “horse operas”) alive. Clint Eastwood’s “Unforgiven” (1992) and George P. Cosmatos’ “Tombstone” (1993) get all the credit for revitalizing Westerns in the 1990s.

Billy the Kid and his Regulators got there first.

The post How ‘Young Guns II’ Fueled Unlikely Western Revival appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/YSAyn2z
Dueling ‘Legend’ Versions Reveal Ridley Scott’s Biggest Risk

Dueling ‘Legend’ Versions Reveal Ridley Scott’s Biggest Risk

Director Ridley Scott’s “Legend” (1985) is among the most intriguingly out-of-character works of his remarkable career.

What do I mean by that?

If “Alien” (1979), “Blade Runner” (1982) and “Gladiator” (2000) are the signature works that everyone knows, then this is, like “1492 – Conquest of Paradise” (1992), “Matchstick Men” (2002) and “House of Gucci” (2021) cause cinephiles to arch their eyebrows when they realize Scott’s body of work has wild choices and unexpected treasures.

YouTube Video

“Legend” takes place in a Once Upon a Time universe where we meet Lili (Mia Sara), an embodiment of all that is good. Lili’s love for Jack (Tom Cruise), a good, wholesome forest dweller, is matched by her protective way with unicorns.

This balance is broken when Darkness (Tim Curry) assigns his goblins to steal the unicorn’s horns and taint Lili’s innocence. Jack must join a group of goofy forest elves to infiltrate the castle where Darkness is keeping Lili and the unicorns as his prisoners.

“Legend” is unrushed, even patient in its storytelling. That’s if you’re watching the Director’s Cut and not the truncated, decent but compromised theatrical version. The director’s cut was released in Europe in 1985, while the U.S. version appeared in early 1986.

The story of how Scott was ordered to make changes to his film by its studio head prior to release became its own legend. Scott submitted to the kind of intrusive changes that Terry Gilliam fought against with his own Universal release the same year, “Brazil.”

Whereas Gilliam fought against the studio, ignored pages of suggested cuts and threats of a shelved release, in a public battle he ultimately won, Scott gave in. He took the studio’s notes and allowed the U.S. release to stand in contrast to the longer, far better European cut.

Both versions have their high points and disadvantages, though one of the biggest contrasts is how each version has a completely different score, but more on that later.

“Legend” looks as good as one would imagine from the filmmaker who had just come off the one-two punch of “Alien” and “Blade Runner.” Every shot appears to be painstakingly created, like a Thomas Kinkade rendering of a Tolkien illustration.

One can imagine that, before Scott calls “Action,” someone whispers, “Okay, cue the rabbits…cue the birds…and the horses…and the smoke machine…and the butterflies, and the owl!”

Majestic one minute, unsettling the next, “Legend” is just like the fairy tales that delighted and mortified me during my childhood. It’s a strange film, especially when you consider it came from Scott.

Some of it plays like a Disney movie, while other moments are so terrifying, you wonder if Scott ever cared who the film’s audience would be.

Sara, who resembles Vivien Leigh and starred in this a year before “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” is wonderful as Princess Lili, who first appears singing a lovely melody.

Jack is earnest top to bottom, which Cruise, post-“Risky Business” but a year before “Top Gun,” completely gives himself to. In Cruise’s intro, he resembles Peter Pan, as a bird lands on his shoulder. In the next shot, he’s holding a fox.

By the way, this was my first Tom Cruise movie.

Cruise is wrong for this, but it’s a fascinating miscast. He’s all in and in total service of his director. This is not a star vehicle, and it can be argued that this is among the rare films where he’s part of an ensemble and not the central focus (as in “The Outsiders,” “Magnolia” and “Tropic Thunder”).

As wrong as the actor clearly is for his role, this is a best-case scenario, where the miscast shows the actor giving it all he’s got, even when the material doesn’t suit him. Cruise’s tearfully apologizing to a unicorn is still less silly than any scene from “The Mummy” (2017).

“Legend” has a similar story angle to “The Dark Crystal” (1983), in which two children take on an intimidating evil, though this is, of course, a quality shared in many fairy tales. The scenes of Sara running in slow motion across a giant chess board are strikingly similar to a sequence from “Krull” (1983), another high-profile 1980s fantasy with a devoted worldwide cult following.

YouTube Video

Of the two music soundtracks: Jerry Goldsmith’s thrilling, beautiful score for the European version is among his greatest, most versatile works. It’s warm one minute, then thunderous and scary the next.

If you listen closely, you can hear the “Psycho II” (1983) love theme in one of Goldsmith’s cues.

In the U.S., we got the Tangerine Dream score. I love this group and used to listen to their score from “Risky Business” while driving home from Denver after a long day’s work. Tangerine Dream’s main theme deserves the fan devotion and suits the film just fine, but Goldsmith’s score is the one I’ve listened to the most.

The comparisons to the dueling versions don’t stop with the music, as there are differences that greatly differentiate how the story is shaped.

In the two-hour European cut, Darkness’ trio of goblin workers are even more annoying and never scary. The colorful side characters, in either version, are given too much focus.

In his “Labyrinth” (1986), Jim Henson knew better than to let his puppets overshadow Jennifer Connelly. No matter which version you view, the second act of “Legend” has too much sneaking around in the snow.

Long before we get our first look at Darkness, the make-up effects are amazing. The actors are pulling off remarkably expressive turns, despite being buried under Rob Bottin’s awe-inducing, Oscar-nominated make-up.

YouTube Video

The scenes between Sara and Curry are elegant, a contrast to the clunky bits with Cruise and the elves. Darkness resembles the devil from “South Park,” complete with low bass in his voice.

As unsettling as Curry is to look at, let alone listen to (his delicious vocals have been somewhat augmented here), he’s one-upped by another actor: Yes, that’s Robert Picardo, buried under persuasive make-up, as the terrifying Meg Mucklebones.

“Legend” is far too frightening for children but too earnest for adults. Scenes of cute side characters screaming in terror as they’re being dragged off to execution are too much. There are scenes here that are as scary as anything in “Alien” (1979).

How on Earth did this get a PG-rating?

Despite being the number one movie at the box office for its first two weeks in theaters, “Legend” failed so hard at the U.S. box office that Scott followed it up with two contemporary cop thrillers.

“Legend” has a real problem in either version, which is how its second act positively crawls. The earnest gives way to true horror, as the tonal balance Peter Jackson brought to his “Lord of the Rings” series alludes Scott.

It’s a flawed film, which is obvious whether one is aware of the two versions or not. However, if you’ve never seen it before (and it needs to be seen at least once, especially if you love Scott’s films), start with the European version, then revisit it via the clipped ’86 U.S. version for a fascinating comparison.

The post Dueling ‘Legend’ Versions Reveal Ridley Scott’s Biggest Risk appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/YytG8O6
Why ‘In Your Dreams’ (Barely) Makes the Grade

Why ‘In Your Dreams’ (Barely) Makes the Grade

Alex Woo’s “In Your Dreams” is a CGI animated family comedy that comes close to being on the level with the likes of “The Mitchells Vs. The Machines” (2021), but falls short of hitting that mark.

On the plus side for the filmmakers – this has been such a bad year for Pixar (actually, a bad couple of years) that the film’s Pixar-esque qualities are a positive aspect and won’t make the viewer wish they were watching something else.

YouTube Video

The story: Stevie (Jolie Hoang-Rappaport) and her little brother Elliot (Elias Janssen) discover a book that details how to summon The Sandman in their dreams. Their homelife takes a hard turn when their parents (who used to be successful musicians) are contemplating splitting, both for work and personal reasons.

Believing The Sandman can alter this trajectory, he is brought to life, but this is immediately revealed to be a bad idea. Far more helpful is a beloved toy, Baloney Tony, who comes to life in the dream world and helps Stevie and Elliot make their way through fantastic realms.

The dream sequences work best when played as a big joke, like variations on the old, dreaded dream of being naked in a department store, crashing a car that is out of control, or experiencing claustrophobia, etc. Among the strongest portions here are when the dream world creates a scenario so persuasive that Stevie struggles to be interested in the reality of her waking life.

Elliot, the younger brother, steals the film and has the best lines. Although Simu Liu and Craig Robinson are in the supporting cast, there are no celebrity voice turns that dominate the proceedings, which works to the film’s benefit.

YouTube Video

Woo’s prior film contributions include being Story Artist on a handful of great Disney/Pixar films, including “Ratatouille” (2007), “WALL-E” (2008) and the eternally underrated “The Good Dinosaur” (2015). “In Your Dreams” is Woo’s first film as director and co-writer, and he demonstrates a gift for maintaining a sustained comic tone in the midst of a far-out premise.

There are lots of other movies this borrowed from, ranging from “Inception” (2010) to “Labyrinth” (1986) to any number of “Nightmare on Elm Street” installments. The tone and consistency as a comedy and visual enchantment derived from the best scenes are why I thought of “The Mitchells Vs. the Machines.”

I doubt this one will hit as big as that one did.

Nevertheless, I liked this clan and was struck by how well the issue of a broken family is addressed – it hits hard enough to become a real dramatic sticking point but not so much that it tonally derails the film and becomes something emotionally unbearable.

Come to think of it, a recent Pixar movie that I didn’t like as much as “In Your Dreams” is “Inside Out 2” (2024), which has a heavy-handedness that Woo wisely avoids. For an effective but small-scale film that most haven’t heard of before it got a Netflix push, “In Your Dreams” is better than expected and yes, pun intended, a real sleeper.

Two and a Half Stars (out of four)

The post Why ‘In Your Dreams’ (Barely) Makes the Grade appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/Iw5mg6F
‘Muzzle: City of Wolves’ Will Make Audiences Sit and Stay

‘Muzzle: City of Wolves’ Will Make Audiences Sit and Stay

Did you know K9 officers can receive full dress funerals?

It’s a minor detail in “Muzzle: City of Wolves,” but one that captures the film’s sense of purpose. Aaron Eckhart returns as a troubled veteran turned dog trainer trying to escape the mayhem he created in 2023’s “Muzzle.”

Good luck with that.

YouTube Video

Eckhart once more plays Jake Rosser, a PTSD-scarred veteran who finally seems at peace. He has a steady partner (Tanya van Graan) and a child. And let’s not forget Socks, the K9 cop he bonded with in “Muzzle.”

That tranquility is shattered by a smartly choreographed home invasion. Could the drug cartel tied to the thugs Jake dispatched in the first film be to blame? Or is a new threat afoot?

Either way, Jake’s family is in someone’s crosshairs, forcing him to enter the belly of the beast. Our antihero, along with his new K9 partner Argos, must survive a shocking smear campaign, shady local officials and, as always, his inner demons.

The latter may be his downfall.

Eckhart knows “City of Wolves” demands a physical presence, and he’s more than capable of dishing out the punishment. It’s how he treats Jake’s wounded side that impresses. His tortured soul is never truly at peace, even in quiet moments.

What might have been a cliched take on PTSD becomes something darker yet still human.

The film’s villain is mostly seen in small doses, but his eventual reveal isn’t as potent as it should be. Far better is a corrupt cop (Karl Thaning) on Jake’s tail. He’s a relentless foe, at times too relentless for logical purposes, but his backstory contrasts shrewdly with Jake’s mission.

Director John Stalberg Jr.’s K9 saga remains averse to black and white cues, and unapologetically so.

“City of Wolves'” attempt to capture Argos’ doggie trauma isn’t an easy sell, and the story lacks the original’s snap. It’s still elegantly shot for a genre film and Eckhart’s turn is purposely raw.

A third-act exchange involving conspiracy theories is emblematic of the film’s retro style. This franchise doesn’t play by the Hollywood rules.

“City of Wolves” ends on an understandably dour note, suggesting a third “Muzzle” could be the saga’s logical conclusion. We’ll sit and stay for a final round of Jake and his furry friends.

HiT or Miss: Aaron Eckhart makes “Muzzle: City of Wolves” a genre movie that deserves to be taken seriously.

The post ‘Muzzle: City of Wolves’ Will Make Audiences Sit and Stay appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/iVbp9qF
‘Baltimorons’ – The Year’s Most Unexpected Rom-Com

‘Baltimorons’ – The Year’s Most Unexpected Rom-Com

“The Baltimorons” is what indie filmmaking is all about.

Or, to be more accurate, what it should be all about.

The romance follows a suicidal improv comic bonding with a distracted divorcee. The leads aren’t traditionally attractive, the comic beats arrive with sizable baggage, and there’s no wacky set piece to anchor the story.

What’s left? An endearing tale told with humor, heart and boundless empathy. More, please.

YouTube Video

Michael Strassner plays Cliff, a former improv comic trying to make sense of his life. The film opens with his suicide attempt going comically wrong, but Cliff’s plucky spirit belies that state of mind.

He seems happy in his current relationship, but a clumsy moment finds him scrambling for a dentist on Christmas Eve.

Lousy timing.

Luckily, one nearby dentist is still in town and is willing to treat him. That’s Didi (Liz Larsen), who opens her office long enough to deal with Cliff’s crisis. It’s the start of an unusual 24 hours for the unlikely duo, one filled with towed cars, unctuous exes and a chance to reconnect with Cliff’s improv days.

Cliff isn’t looking to escape a troubled relationship. His fiancée Brittany (Olivia Luccardi) seems like a kind person, and she’s certainly patient with his sobriety. He hasn’t had a drink in six months, and Brittany knows how precarious his sober state remains.

She even tracks his phone to make sure he doesn’t stray. Still, there’s something about the older, wiser Didi that gets Cliff’s attention. 

Strassner, who cowrote “The Baltimorons” with director Jay Duplass, plays Cliff like the most lovable cousin at your family reunion. The actor still lets his anguish rise to the surface, whether it’s his irrational fear of needles or worries he’ll relapse if he hits an improv stage again.

Didi seems emotionally healthy, but she’s grappling with an ex-husband who left her for a younger, ditzy bride.

The two seem like an oil and water combination until their characters begin to click. She needs his upbeat, unpredictable spirit, while he’s enamored with her grounded approach to life.

He longs for normalcy. She’s suffocated by it.

The comical scenes flow organically, although a long sequence involving a towed car should have been trimmed. Still, watching these two souls navigate the holiday and their respective wounds is engaging, even uplifting.

FAST FACT: The crew behind “The Baltimorons” shot around the greater Baltimore area in 2023, including scenes set under the Francis Scott Key bridge before its March 2024 collapse.

“The Baltimorons” refuses to demonize Brittany or insist this new love connection is anything but imperfect. That makes what happens on this curious night all the more remarkable.

Duplass, a veteran indie talent, turns Baltimore into an unlikely character in the story. His camera captures the city’s charm, with a nod to the NFL’s Ravens for good measure. There’s not a drop of artifice to be found.

The film’s best moment comes via an improv sequence. The main characters open up in ways that cement their bond, but it’s almost too painful to process, both for them and us.

It’s hard to imagine that arc during their initial meeting, but “The Baltimorons” has the integrity and patience to lead us to that magical moment.

HiT or Miss: “The Baltimorons” is a low-key charmer, a movie romance that’s satisfying and smart.

The post ‘Baltimorons’ – The Year’s Most Unexpected Rom-Com appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/RkiV13A
‘Nouvelle Vague’ Keeps Film Legend Godard at Arm’s Length

‘Nouvelle Vague’ Keeps Film Legend Godard at Arm’s Length

Richard Linklater’s “Nouvelle Vague” is about the making of Jean-Luc Godard’s French New Wave classic, “Breathless” (1960).

Netflix carries both films as of Nov. 14, and I highly recommend watching Godard’s original first, then viewing Linklater’s take on how the film was made as an act of creative rebellion.

YouTube Video

When we meet Jean-Luc Godard (Guillaume Marbeck) in Paris of the late 1950s, he’s a restless, arrogant and brilliant writer at Cahiers du Cinema and one of the few artists in the presence of filmmaker legends who has yet to make his first film. When money and opportunity finally arrive, Godard assembles a cast and crew but immediately irritates and challenges his collaborators with his unorthodox filming, writing and even in the way he takes days off.

Few recognize the brilliance of Godard’s anti-Hollywood, deconstructionist approach to making cinema, including his lead, Jean Seberg (Zoey Deutch), the American actress who attaches herself to “Breathless” and immediately regrets it.

“Nouvelle Vague” is enjoyable and moves fast, though it never penetrates the inner life, motivations and defiance of Godard.

Tim Burton’s “Ed Wood” (1994) is still the best version of this kind of tale. For cinephiles who know about Godard’s body of work, I’d suggest that the tumultuous making of his “Contempt” (1968) and “King Lear” (1987) would have provided far more colorful and entertainingly chaotic making of period comedies.

The cinematography and art direction are uncanny at recreating the setting, as the clever touches that evoke the film style of the era, complete with “cigarette burns.”

I enjoyed how every character is introduced quickly with a title card and shown facing the camera. It allows for movie history buffs to stargaze. Look, it’s Robert Bresson! Hey, it’s Francois Truffaut!! The actors look uncannily like their real-life counterparts, though only Deutch gets to fully explore her historical figure.

Having read more than a few texts on Godard, he is a tricky figure to pin down, to put it mildly. However, even the fantasy-infused “Hitchcock” (2012), with its divisive lead turn by Sir Anthony Hopkins and a goofy subplot with Ed Gein as a quasi-muse during the making of “Psycho” (1960), managed to probe its subject and not just resort to mimicry.

Marbeck’s take on Godard is always great fun to watch (yes, Godard was full of himself and frustrating, but also a genius and his instincts were correct), but we’re always on the outside looking in. It’s not the requirement of a film about Godard to definitively dissect the cinema icon but I figured Linklater, of all directors, would have been up to the challenge.

Yet, even though it falls short as a character study, “Nouvelle Vague” maintains its hold and entertainment value as a movie about the making of a real game changer.

YouTube Video

I like Linklater’s film enough to recommend it, but I have one more caveat: the film needed an epilogue or even a closing title card establishing what happened once “Breathless” was released. Linklater’s film ends with the conclusion of the “Breathless” shoot but needed to go on.

The uninitiated may watch this and think Godard simply made this film as a goof on conventional filmmaking, but the truth is more profound: whether you like the man or not, Godard and his films, style, unusual methods to filmmaking and storytelling influenced everyone from Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, Spike Lee and Martin Scorsese, to name a small few.

New Wave Film, as a style and genre, may not be for everyone, but it changed the way many film artists made movies and thought about making them.

Funny enough, “Nouvelle Vague” is itself too conventional to be a true work of New Wave Filmmaking, but you know what movie is? Linklater’s “Before Sunrise” (1995) and the two sequels that followed it!

Linklater didn’t need to recreate the world of “Breathless” to demonstrate how he has already mastered the genre of film Godard created.

Three Stars (out of four)

The post ‘Nouvelle Vague’ Keeps Film Legend Godard at Arm’s Length appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/zQO206r
Shocking ‘Christy’ Goes the Distance Thanks to Sweeney

Shocking ‘Christy’ Goes the Distance Thanks to Sweeney

The Smashing Machine” gave Dwayne Johnson the chance to prove he’s an actor of consequence.

He passed the test, but there’s a problem. MMA star Mark Kerr’s life lacked the dramatic twists that power the best sports biopics.

Female boxing legend Christy Martin overdelivers on that front.

“Christy” offers so much more to explore, from attempts to broaden boxing’s appeal to domestic violence and, ultimately, Survival 101.

“Christy” doesn’t radically tinker with the biopic mold, but the story’s dramatic heft and an impressive turn by Sydney Sweeney, make it a superior experience to Johnson’s “Machine.”

YouTube Video

Sweeney’s Christy Salters stumbles into her future profession. She’s discovered after an amateur boxing match and is soon paired with an unsavory trainer, played to perfection by Ben Foster. That’s Jim Martin, a mediocre boxing mind with a chip on his shoulder as obvious as his combover.

Jim shapes Christy into a credible boxer, but along the way manages to woo her into his bedroom. That’s no small order, given that Christy is a lesbian, albeit one willing to hide that part of her life.

Christy’s rise to the top of her sport won’t be easy, but not just for the usual reasons. Women’s boxing wasn’t a draw in the 1990s. Heck, boxing in general continues to linger in the UFC’s shadow.

Still, her scrappy style, WWE-style pageantry and grit could make her famous. At worst, she’s a novelty act of the first order. Could her duplicitous family stall her success? What if Jim beats them to it?

RELATED: SHOULD CONSERVATIVES SUPPORT SWEENEY’S ‘CHRISTY?’

Sweeney hasn’t tackled a role as challenging as Christy Martin to date, but she never looks overmatched by the material. She’s credible inside the ring and out, unwilling to play up to any Big, Oscar-Bait moments. No scenery chewing, thank you.

Christy’s humble nature makes it hard to pinpoint her character at first, and Sweeney rolls with that assignment. Is she a battered soul overmatched by life? A woman fighting to escape her family’s lack of empathy?

What drives her to train so hard despite the odds?

Sweeney’s performance slowly unlocks the mystery, something that takes time but is worth the effort.

Foster, all coiled rage and insecurity, is perfectly cast as the film’s villain. If anything, the screenplay by director David Michod and spouse Mirrah Foulkes could have shown him in a more sympathetic light, at least on occasion, to seal their curious deal.

Even more frustrating? Christy’s Mom (Merritt Wever), who lacks a single dimension beyond parental disappointment.

YouTube Video

Smaller roles spike the story at just the right time. Boxing impresario Don King (Chad L. Coleman) promises to make Christy a star mid-movie, but the film doesn’t sugarcoat his predatory style. Katy O’Brian offers an intriguing contrast as one of Christy’s most notable opponents, a figure who looms larger in the story as Christy’s personal life crumbles.

The boxing sequences aren’t as elaborate or focused as most sports biopics, and that’s likely for the best. The focus here is Christy’s journey, and the real-life drama behind her marriage makes for a consequential third act.

Women’s boxing may never break out as a cultural institution, but that doesn’t detract from what Sweeney and co. achieve with “Christy.”

HiT or Miss: “Christy” is a warts-and-all biopic powered by a sly, understated turn by Sydney Sweeney.

The post Shocking ‘Christy’ Goes the Distance Thanks to Sweeney appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/OT97d5e
‘Die My Love’ Is More Endurance Test Than Movie

‘Die My Love’ Is More Endurance Test Than Movie

Lynn Ramsay’s “Die My Love” is the latest endurance test from the Scottish filmmaker who had me with her stunning “Ratcatcher” (1999) and lost me with her subsequent work.

YouTube Video

When we meet Grace (Jennifer Lawrence), she is crawling through a field and holding a butcher knife. Her husband, Jackson (Robert Pattinson), who is also the father of her child, engages Grace with affection but also fights her verbally and physically.

Grace hasn’t been the same since the birth of her child, and a wildness within them causes their home to become a setting for one crazy outburst and shocking act after another.

Post-“Ratcatcher,” Ramsay’s films are always visually striking but also insufferable, self-indulgent and mean. I hated Ramsay’s 2011 “We Need to Talk About Kevin,” which gave a tasteless, self-consciously arthouse spin on the topic of school shootings.

Ramsay likes her characters far more than her audience.

The two leads give snarling performances, the kind that is riveting to watch in an acting workshop but too much when the camera goes for a close-up.

“Die My Love” starts with the dial cranked up to CRAZY and just keeps going. There’s no real story. You just sit and wait for something bad to happen, and the film never disappoints.

The soundtrack irritates as much as this couple. Unless you’re a die-hard fan of the leads, this is one of the biggest movie endurance tests of 2025.

Before the first hour is over, I’ve seen Lawrence crawl on all fours, lick a windowpane, make childish faces, mock her dog, masturbate, scream and make even more faces. Pattinson, not to be outdone, paces around like he’s in a farce, makes faces at Lawrence and reverts to his awful “Twilight” American accent.

A better title for this than “Die My Love” is “When Actors Attack.” This movie is a freak show and I hate that the appeal of working with Ramsay pulled in two fantastic actors who should be beyond making low-budget junk like this. Lawrence and Pattinson are at a point in their careers where they can be much choosier than a decade ago.

Lawrence doesn’t need another “House at the End of the Street” (2012) or “Serena” (2014) and Pattinson has, hopefully, graduated from the likes of “Little Ashes” (2009) and “Remember Me” (2010). Both actors deserve the acclaim they’ve acquired, as they’re reliably great in just about everything. “Die My Love” is not worthy of them and will hopefully become a footnote.

YouTube Video

The scenes with Sissy Spacek and Nick Nolte are such a breath of fresh air, as they ground their characters and justify their presence in the story.

Lawrence’s best moment comes late in the film, when she makes a confession regarding her parents. She’s compelling in the scene because, other than everything that came before it, Lawrence appears to be invested in her character and not just winging it through yet another scene where she acts bananas.

A secret that most actors don’t share is that it’s not difficult to act “crazy.” It’s actually much harder to convey “normal” and commit to the growth and nuances of a character.

Some actresses who have provided master classes playing women becoming unglued are Elizabeth Taylor in “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf” (1966), Kathy Bates in “Misery” (1990) and Isabelle Adjani in “Possession” (1981), to name just a few. There was nuance and control to those performances.

Nothing Lawrence or Pattinson does here approaches that. Here’s another rule of acting, particularly when you’re improvising: not every instinct is a good one.

“Die My Love” has some splendid visuals and is so thoroughly bonkers that it’s never dull. Ramsay has lots of talent, and I will revisit “Ratcatcher” again but I’m growing tired of her recent cinematic torture sessions.
Lawrence’s performance in Darren Aronofsky’s “Mother!” (2017) and that film’s scenario of going mad in an isolated environment, far outshines everything in this movie.

In fact, “Mother!,” all is forgiven.

One Star

The post ‘Die My Love’ Is More Endurance Test Than Movie appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/s1RJckH
Powerful ‘Sarah’s Oil’ Shines Spotlight on Plucky Heroine

Powerful ‘Sarah’s Oil’ Shines Spotlight on Plucky Heroine

Hollywood remains obsessed with racism, witness DEI-style policies and absurd casting choices.

Racism, particularly the toxic kind displayed during the early part of the 20th century, endures as a fertile ground for storytellers.

Director Cyrus Nowrasteh strikes gold, or better yet, Texas Tea, with “Sarah’s Oil.” The fact-based yarn leans into the subject without lectures or virtue signaling tics. It’s the stunning story of a black girl’s quest to find oil beneath land given to her through the Dawes Allotment Act of 1887.

The racists of the era, alas, had other ideas.

It’s a heckuva yarn, one Nowrasteh delivers with plenty of Hollywood spit polish. Hissable enemies. Triumphant heroines. And enough grit to remind us how bigotry once stalked this great nation.

YouTube Video

Young Sarah Rector (a solid Naya Desir-Johnson) becomes the owner of a large swath of Oklahoma land, thanks to her dual heritage – Black and Native American. And, she insists, those 160 acres of seemingly barren land brim with oil.

Her faith tells her so. Recent oil discoveries on neighboring properties do, too.

That draws the attention of a local oil company led by Garret Dillahunt, perfectly cast as the story’s villain. There’s a reason he’s sniffing around her land, but he holds his cards tightly to his chest.

Sarah finds an unlikely ally in Bert (Zachary Levi). He’s a duplicitous soul with a kernel of goodness lurking within. Just how big, though, is anyone’s guess.

Together, the two attempt to dig deep enough, literally, to prove Sarah’s instincts are sound.

It won’t be easy. Drilling equipment isn’t cheap. And the company run by Dillahunt’s character won’t let Sarah dig without a fight. And can Sarah and her tight-knit family trust Bert?

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Sarah’s Oil (@sarahsoilfilm)

“Sarah’s Oil” takes sizable license with the facts in question. What emerges is an audience pleaser that’s accessible and smart. Young Desir-Johnson wisely underplays her role, offering some wise-beyond-her-years moments as well as child-like glee and impatience.

That balance matters.

Levi plays Bert broadly, but within the confines of Nowrasteh’s tone he becomes the film’s emotional flashpoint. Yes, he’s a scoundrel, but he’s chasing redemption as well as cold, hard cash.

The film offers sturdy pacing, solid performances, and an unusual heroine. Christian audiences won’t have to look far for spiritual succor, but it’s integrated effortlessly into the screenplay, courtesy of Nowrasteh and his creative partner/bride Betsy Nowrasteh.

A third-act clash feels too clean given the oil company’s lascivious ways, but it wraps the story up in a tensely affixed bow. It also reminds us of the film’s roots and why this story deserved a big-screen closeup.

YouTube Video

Parts of “Sarah’s Oil” overlap “Killers of the Flower Moon,” a larger-scale production recalling the chilling hate that consumed many from that chapter in U.S. history. The former captures the era’s raw racism in unsettling fashion, but without “Moon’s” R-rated flourishes.

That bigotry gripped the mainstream. something “Sarah’s Oil” won’t deny. Even one of Sarah’s closest allies isn’t immune to the casual bigotry.

Nowrasteh’s film doesn’t frame that hate from a 21st century lens. That gives his film an unexpected and necessary edge.

HiT or Miss: “Sarah’s Oil” is a smart, satisfying tale spun from a remarable story that’s ripe for a Hollywood treatment.

The post Powerful ‘Sarah’s Oil’ Shines Spotlight on Plucky Heroine appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/RAa4Ssd
‘Predator: Badlands’ – Get to the Exits!

‘Predator: Badlands’ – Get to the Exits!

“A ‘Predator’ movie where the creature is the good guy who teams with a plucky lady robot…” – Don Draper, never.

“Predator: Badlands” proves the aging franchise has an identity crisis. Yes, installments one and two were wildly different, but they still cast a gaggle of humans against an alien fighting machine.

Not enough people cared about either “Predators” (2010) and “The Predator” (2018), and understandably so. And the less said about “Alien vs. Predator: Requiem” (2007), the better.

Now, we get a movie hoping to revive the saga after Hulu’s shockingly competent “Prey.” It might work, but in doing so director Dan Trachtenberg essentially removed the saga’s mystique and mission.

YouTube Video

The film opens with a father and son dueling to the possible death. 

Dek (Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi) is the runt of the Yautja litter (Yes, we don’t have to call them Predators anymore), and his family expects little from him. Dek wants to prove them wrong, so he sets out to kill a legendary beast to prove his mettle.

Right away, the dialogue and storytelling are at the elementary grade level, not an unforgivable sin for a genre film, but a glimpse at what’s to come.

Our lovable Dek runs into a synthetic human named Thia (Elle Fanning, giving it her all in a tale unworthy of her skills). The two become unlikely allies as they stalk a mythical creature named the Kalisk. Thia has a more ambitious goal – to reunite with her “sister.”

Oh, and Thia has lost the lower half of her body, so she must be carried on Dek’s back. The unlikely duo slowly bond, with Thia cracking wise and Dek shedding some of his Yautja identity.

Awwwww. Get a room, you two.

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Predator (@predator)

That bare-bones plot breakdown doesn’t capture the film’s slick visuals or non-stop action. This film never takes a breath.

Great, right?

Said action feels important but darned if we can follow it as intended. The great action directors – think James Cameron – deliver mayhem with a clarity that matters. Here, the visuals are dark, the action beats are murky and it all just becomes visual noise.

“Predator: Badlands” cribs from across the sci-fi galaxy, especially with a nod to “Aliens.” We’re even treated to a team of synthetic humans stationed on the planet where the Kalisk roam.

The story itself is easy to follow, but in 2025 there’s something a bit … off about a synthetic hero and our willingness to enjoy her human-like qualities. That landed differently in the past, especially with the mighty Data on “Star Trek: The Next Generation.”

Now, with A.I. threatening to overturn so much of society? You decide.

And that’s not all. The Predator is a fierce movie monster, a fighting machine that strikes fear with every sound. Here, he’s just another protagonist, stripped of his aura for all to see.

He’s ordinary. And we’re asked to invest in his family turmoil. Not hard pass, but pass.

“Predator: Badlands” works best as a standalone genre film, one aimed at the teen set. Blame that PG:13 rating and a story that never challenges, only ladles out cute moments and simplistic story arcs.

None of this is terrible. None of this connects to the “Predator” mythos, either.

HiT or Miss: “Predator: Badlands” removes the mystique and villainy from the franchise, turning it into the wacky buddy film no one wanted.

The post ‘Predator: Badlands’ – Get to the Exits! appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/56pLaAb
Exhume ‘Corpse Bride’ for Forgotten Tim Burton Treat

Exhume ‘Corpse Bride’ for Forgotten Tim Burton Treat

“Tim Burton’s Corpse Bride” (2005) isn’t as celebrated as the stop-motion films Burton produced and/or directed before and since (more on those later), but it deserves to be rediscovered.

Burton’s imagination and dedication to the art of stop-motion animation storytelling, this time courtesy of co-director Mike Johnson, are always worth savoring.

YouTube Video

Victor (Johnny Depp) is sweet but spineless, engaged to Victoria, a lovely woman (Emily Watson) who agrees to the arranged marriage. While Victor and Victoria immediately find themselves twitterpated with one another, their shyness and the pressure from their domineering parents literally scare Victor off.

While hiding in the woods and practicing his wedding vows, Victor accidentally proposes to a corpse (Helena Bonham Carter) who comes to life, yanks Victor into the world of the dead and adds further complication to his already stressful scenario.

“Corpse Bride” has become the “other” Burton stop-motion animated film, as it has songs that aren’t as catchy as the ones in “The Nightmare Before Christmas” (1993), the undisputed classic. Nor does it boast characters as endearing and moments anywhere near as moving as in “Frankenweenie” (2011), the true masterpiece of Burton’s stop-motion theatrical films.

Utilizing washed-out colors in the “real” world, “Corpse Bride” depicts the world of the afterlife as though it were a merry night in a pub. Burton has taken us into such a world before but, whereas “Beetlejuice” (1988) fleshed out the concept fully, this one skims the surface.

The songs by Danny Elfman are exposition heavy and not up to anything belted out by Jack Skellington, though the title song is cool. Still, I wanted this to be more of a consistent musical. Perhaps “The Nightmare Before Christmas,” a great but relentless, exhausting film, set the bar too high, but I wasn’t able to keep the songs playing in my head on the drive home.

Burton’s best films are character-driven, while his worst are gimmick-driven or stuck to IP fidelity. “Corpse Bride” is too short and simple to fly as high as his best films, but the finest moments are rooted in character and explore the central love triangle.

Depp, Watson and Bonham Carter connect with the warmth and idiosyncrasies of their characters but the film is stolen by Richard A. Grant, playing Lord Barkiss, a real scoundrel who competes with Victor over Victoria.

YouTube Video

“Big Fish” (2003) is probably Burton’s finest love story, but “Corpse Bride,” even though it is a lesser film than his other stop-motion classics, is Burton’s most enjoyably twisted and odd romance since his “Batman Returns” (1992).

Victor and Victoria are adorable, as they genuinely love each other in a world of arranged marriages and partnering for social protection. As always, Burton is celebrating outsiders and dreamers who come across as oddballs in a world of conformity.

Speaking of odd, a great supporting character is a maggot who lives in the Corpse Bride’s skull (with Peter Lorre’s voice, no less) and the character is the best of the underworld figures. Otherwise, the undead supporting characters are interchangeable.

Hard to believe that, just 15 years removed from his debut of “Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure” (1985), longtime fans felt a collective Burton fatigue. I admit to feeling that way with “Planet of the Apes” (2001), which avoided gothic visuals but felt trapped by the blockbuster expectations placed on its director.

“Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” was released the same year as “Corpse Bride” and, while I enjoyed that one a great deal, it is today recalled by most as an unloved blockbuster.

The animation in “Corpse Bride” is always amazing. While the dead world here lacks the varying topography and visual humor of “The Nightmare Before Christmas,” Burton’s twisted sense of humor is always visible. Despite the abrupt manner of that final scene, the love story goes as far as it should.

If “The Nightmare Before Christmas” is a December staple and “Frankenweenie” is a must for every Halloween party, then Burton’s underrated “Corpse Bride” is an unorthodox but solid pick for your next Valentine’s Day movie night.

The post Exhume ‘Corpse Bride’ for Forgotten Tim Burton Treat appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/AnX9aJe
‘A House of Dynamite’ Never Ignites

‘A House of Dynamite’ Never Ignites

Kathryn Bigelow’s “A House of Dynamite” is so intense that I was compelled to keep watching, but it’s also a contrived movie that I didn’t think twice about once it ended.

Bigelow’s film mostly works in the moment, has some fine performances and has been made with skill. However, coming from one of my favorite filmmakers, whose works are typically tough as nails and unforgettable, I was surprised by how quickly it passed from my mind after watching it.

YouTube Video

It begins on a day like any other, as we see a variety of characters starting their morning routines and going through security checks in various government and military buildings. Reports of a missile launch, with a nuke on the way to Chicago, begin with optimism that it can be controlled.

Then the giant Defcon sign keeps lowering its numbers, the U.S. President is pulled away from a photo op and everyone is frantically calling their loved ones with instructions to drop everything and leave.

This plays like a Roland Emmerich disaster film, with cliched characters and one-note set-ups, escalating into situation room panic. Whereas Emmerich would eventually reward his audience with spectacle, Bigelow offers none whatsoever.

This is a depiction of an environment of existential dread and not much more than that. I was surprised to discover this is based on a screenplay by Noah Oppenheim and not a stage play, which is what it resembles the most.

Even Bigelow’s lesser films look amazing, but her exceptional eye for visual composition is dialed down here.

Filmmakers tend to gravitate to more mature material later in life, but I missed the wildness of “Point Break” (1991), where Bigelow took a B-movie screenplay and made it gripping and downright mythic. Ditto, my favorite of her works, “Strange Days” (1995).

Nothing here comes close to matching Stanley Kubrick’s “Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb” (1964). Kubrick’s film came out 61 years ago, but it’s the far more entertaining, unsettling and well-rounded vision of a nuclear apocalypse.

So is either version of “Fail-Safe” (Sidney Lumet’s 1964 original or the 2000 TV movie).

YouTube Video

The actors in Bigelow’s film admirably never give into histrionics, but the dialogue often sounds written and trailer-ready (“There is no plan B”). Tracy Letts steals it as a seen-it-all General and is visibly having the most fun. Idris Elba has some strong moments as an Obama-like president finding himself cornered and, after a strong start, Rebecca Ferguson exits the movie.

The shuffling movie stars in supporting roles is yet another factor that made me think I was watching a movie from the director of “Godzilla” (1998), not “Near Dark” (1986). Note how Greta Lee, a terrific actress, is required here to literally phone in her cameo appearance or how Jason Clarke walks around the set, adding to the tension and spouting more “this-is-the-moment” dialogue.

I kept waiting for the big reveal that the Vice President is played by Jeff Goldblum (no such luck).

The decision to show the same scenario three times, from three different vantage points, doesn’t elevate the drama and only makes it an exercise in redundancy. What worked for Akira Kurosawa’s “Rashomon” (1950) doesn’t connect in the same way here.

FAST FACT: Kathryn Bigelow got handed a crush of teen comedy scripts to direct after her feature debut “The Loveless,” so she spent time teaching before resuming her career with 1987’s “Near Dark.”

“A House of Dynamite” has the tenacity to state that Chicago is in grave danger (I’m sure those in the Windy City will despise this movie) but the film doesn’t really deliver on the threat. Here’s why Bigelow should have gone all the way and actually shown the potential catastrophe the characters are trying to avoid: it heightens the stakes as a cautionary tale.

“Deep Impact” (1998) and “2012” (2009) are trash but, so help me, I was invested in them. I recognize the serious intent at work here, but I’ve seen it all before.

Another problem might be that I’m Gen-Z and grew up with “The Day After” (1983) and “Testament” (also 1983), both of which scared the hell out of me. Those films, the former a highly touted TV movie and the latter a theatrical release, were devastating.

Adam McKay’s smug, overlong and mostly insufferable “Don’t Look Up” (2021) at least provided third act spectacle that had the chutzpah to give an acid punchline after two hours of pontificating. In contrast, Bigelow’s film comes across like every Jerry Bruckheimer or Tom Clancy movie about a stolen, missing or newly discovered nuclear missile, but minus the action, spectacle and lingering resonance.

Yes, the movie will put you on edge, but so does waiting in line at Starbucks.

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Netflix US (@netflix)

What should have been a slam-dunk comeback for Bigelow is one of the great director’s lesser films and, after a brief, half-hearted theatrical window, it’s now more content on Netflix that will be buried alongside piles of unwatched movies in a never-ending queue.

Bigelow’s film is a weird one to write about, as the filmmaking and performances are strong. Once again, Bigelow can take a story with a large ensemble cast and give it immediacy, coherence and dramatic heft. This time, however, I left the film with a shrug, not only because this is far from the first end-of-the-world movie I’ve seen, but because the story doesn’t hit hard enough.

We don’t need movies to inform us that the world will end, nor do we need an illustration of how awful and foolish it is to place this kind of weapon in human hands.

Bigelow was once married to James Cameron, who made a little film called “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” (1991), which has a scene where a woman watches a playground full of small children go up in flames as a mushroom cloud touches down. As if “The Day After” hadn’t already traumatized me, here’s Cameron’s vision (remember, the scene is wordless) to remind us how devastating this scenario is.

Whether you grew up in the age of “duck and cover” or can still see those burning swing sets as clearly as I do in my mind’s eye, nothing in Bigelow’s film is this harrowing but should have been.

Bigelow’s “The Hurt Locker” (2008) and “Zero Dark Thirty” (2012) are razor sharp and will likely be her legacy, but don’t overlook “Blue Steel” (1990), “Strange Days” (1991) or “Point Break” (1991), the latter of which is one of the best action thrillers of the 1990s.

Giving the film two stars out of four sounds like I’m bashing it, which isn’t the case. The problem is, considering the talent and subject matter, it left me indifferent and that should not be the case.

Two Stars

The post ‘A House of Dynamite’ Never Ignites appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/Y5TVNDa