‘Demand for Hate’ Gets to Heart of Hate Crime Hoaxes

Jussie Smollett. Bubba Wallace. Michael Brown. And, for those with long memories, Tawana Brawley.

The list of hate crime hoaxes is nauseating and long, but most documentary filmmakers have little desire to turn their cameras on the subject.

Enter The Daily Caller.

The conservative platform is churning out documentaries to fill the gaps left by Hollywood, Inc. The site’s “Demand for Hate” gets to the heart of the hoax matter, exploring a revolting case that turned a young woman’s life upside down over what appears to be a lie.

The documentary spends most of its screen time on Morgan Bettinger, a UVA student accused of saying she wanted black protesters to be run over like speed bumps.

Except there’s little proof she said that. In fact, she says she shared the opposite thought. Had a truck driver not blocked the roadway, something tragic might have happened, she mused at the time.

No matter. 

On-site protesters ran with the unpleasant narrative, and her UVA dreams curdled into a nightmare. Her cancellation will sound eerily familiar to most viewers.

• Social media persecution
• Abandoned by adults who should know better
• Judged guilty by her peers, facts be damned

“Demand for Hate” examines the case, blaming everyone from the media to the university’s brass for turning a misunderstanding into a debacle on all fronts.

Why?

They said the current hate hoax wave began with Trayvon Martin, the black teen shot by George Zimmerman during an altercation. We may never know what happened between the two, but the Left and the Media (redundant) falsely claimed the clash came down to bigotry.

NBC even selectively edited a Zimmerman 911 call to suggest that fake narrative. Other journalists made up the “White Hispanic” label for Zimmerman.

That, plus the Michael Brown imbroglio set the stage for future hate crime hoaxes. 

It’s a microcosm of what’s wrong with western culture today.

Except given all the hate crime hoaxes of the last few years it shouldn’t absorb so much of the film’s running time. Yes, Bettinger’s case matters, but showing a breadth of similar hoaxes would paint a more powerful picture of why they keep happening.

The film addresses some of the root causes behind said hoaxes. The conservative film takes a surprisingly measured look at the matter. We don’t get partisan talking heads eager to exploit the issue.

instead, “Hate Crime Hoax” author Wilfred Reilly, Legal Insurrection founder William A. Jacobson and others weigh in with keenly observed truths. They describe the mob mentality that fuels these hoaxes along with the media’s culpability. 

Social media also makes matters worse, with cyber-bullying attacking people like Bettinger without context or facts.

A darkly comic segment follows a focus group sharing their views on the subject. When someone asks if the group trusts the mainstream media they answer in near-unison.

“No.”

The documentary takes a bird’s eye view of the culture late in the film, but the observations feel rushed and inadequate to the larger issues in play.

The filmmakers tried to interview Zyahna Bryant, the activist who helped rally the Left against Bettinger, UVA officials and University President James Ryan to glean their side of the story.

They all declined. Their silence speaks volumes. So does the lawsuit that gives the film a marginal happy ending.

“Demand for Hate” offers a single quote to sum it all up, courtesy of Jim Bacon from The Jefferson Council.

“There’s not enough racism to go around.”

HiT or Miss: “Demand for Hate” is a flawed but fascinating look at the rise in hate crime hoaxes.

The post ‘Demand for Hate’ Gets to Heart of Hate Crime Hoaxes appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.