Home » » ‘Salem’s Lot’ Can’t Come Close to TV Miniseries

Director Tobe Hooper turned Stephen King’s “Salem’s Lot” into one of the more frightening yarns to grace the small screen. That two-part mi...

Director Tobe Hooper turned Stephen King’s “Salem’s Lot” into one of the more frightening yarns to grace the small screen.

That two-part miniseries delivered signature scares back in 1979. Remember the undead child floating outside a bedroom window? What about the chief vampire, a beast as ghoulish as any CGI creation?

Max’s “Salem’s Lot,” the oft-delayed reboot of the King property, will be swiftly forgotten, rewatched by curiosity seekers who quickly hit pause to dig out their copy of the 1979 original.

Nothing in the new story sticks, but it does teeter on camp a time or two.

Maybe three.

YouTube Video

Author Ben Mears (Lewis Pullman, son of Bill) is returning to his roots as the story opens. He spent his formative years in Jerusalem’s Lot AKA Salem’s Lot. This is King territory, so it’s a quiet Maine hamlet where secrets are in short supply.

“So, you’re a writah, or something,” goes the early dialogue as Ben makes the rounds. Groan.

A local realtor in training named Sue (Makenzie Leigh) grabs his attention in a classic, “this couple must fall for each other because … reasons” way. Turns out a mysterious stranger has purchased the long-dormant Marsten property, and we learn why that’s awful news for the locals.

He’s not just a European … he’s a vampire!

RELATED: HOW ‘STAND BY ME’ SAVED STEPHEN KING MOVIES

Children begin disappearing. Ben, along with Sue and the local physician (Alfre Woodard, who must have gotten all of her eye-rolling out of her system off camera) set out to solve the mystery.

OK, so spoiler alerts aren’t needed for a King classic, but from the start there’s something clumsy about “Salem’s Lot.” Off, even.

King’s canon is typically long and complicated. “It.” “The Stand.” “Under the Dome.” So telling “Salem’s Lot” anew in under two hours is a problem.

Writer/director Gary Dauberman, a horror vet behind the “Annabelle” franchise and the first two “Conjuring” films, has no clue how to solve said problem. The story feels hopelessly rushed from the jump, with characters solving puzzles and detailing the vampire threat with ease.

Here’s a pro tip: The average person needs a LOT of convincing to think vampires are real.

YouTube Video

The TV miniseries not only had more time but created an eerie sense of calm in the community, not to mention delivering characters that matter. The sense of despair hanging over the main characters, set up in the intriguing prologue, carried through the project.

What does “Salem‘s Lot” 2.0 offer? A young, scrappy Mark (Jordan Preston Carter), who ostensibly fills in for Lance Kerwin from the original. What vampire stands a chance against this wily lad?

It’s ludicrous, but like the rest of “Salem’s Lot” it’s never dull.

Of course, the local priest (John Benjamin Hickey) is a drunk – King’s enmity toward faith is well known. The great character actor William Sadler gets nothing to do as the cowardly sheriff. Bill Camp of “Sound of Freedom” fame enjoys more screen time, but his character doesn’t register beyond his BoSox jacket.

No one does.

It’s unfair to judge a movie based on the behind-the-scenes struggles, but it’s fair to guess the film endured a brisk editing between the end of the official shoot and now. The choppy storytelling is your first clue, shoving us toward a third-act showdown with brain-numbing battles.

Dauberman knows what scares us, but he’s handcuffed himself to material that demands a broader canvas. A few isolated moments are legit chilling, including a silhouetted vampire attack which is perfectly cold and unsettling.

Other visuals grab our attention, but they come and go in a flash before we’re thrust back into the clumsy story.

There’s no need to remake “Salem’s Lot” unless there’s a fresh, and vital approach in place. The new version fails on both fronts.

HiT or Miss: “Salem’s Lot” is never dull, but that’s not enough when talking about the Stephen King film canon.

The post ‘Salem’s Lot’ Can’t Come Close to TV Miniseries appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.



from Movies - Hollywood in Toto https://ift.tt/Nf7QgO3

0 Comments:

Post a Comment